Talk:Camera-ready

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Graphic design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of graphic design-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Graphic designWikipedia:WikiProject Graphic designTemplate:WikiProject Graphic designGraphic design articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Typography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

huh?

"All raster or image files are originally created at a resolution setting of 300 DPI (dots per inch)."

Either this is false or I'm special because I often create raster images at other resolutions. :-) Dac.Gunter (talk) 12:17, 2 October 2008 (UTC)dac.gunter[reply]

If by special you mean retarded, then yes. You create crap that isn't classified as camera ready. 300dpi (or more) is usually required. But your crap doesn't matter if it is pixilated, because a hi-res turd will still be a turd. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.185.6.18 (talk) 15:07, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now there's no need to be mean —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.177.8.56 (talk) 18:21, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]