Talk:Quantinuum

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

On 1 December 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Cambridge Quantum Computing to Quantinuum. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Requested move 1 December 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Colonestarrice (talk) 16:21, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cambridge Quantum Computing → Quantinuum – This entity has been succeeded by a new organization. Indefensible (talk) 03:24, 1 December 2021 (UTC)— Relisting. —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 16:25, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should maintain the CQC history here by creating a new Quantinuum article. See how I created Wunderman Thompson while preserving its predecessors’ info. Otherwise it gets too bulky if we try to put everything in together. In this case there’s no Honeywell Quantum article, but that’s fine – we can just add its history as part of Honeywell Quantum Solutions subsection. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 23:52, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The previous entity remains notable. No reason to rename this article and thus append its history to an article on a different organisation however related. Instead we should see how this new organisation and the related articles develop, giving due weight, and consider a possible merge later. Andrewa (talk) 18:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Reconsider move/rename June 23, 2023

Can this page be considered for renaming/move again with some benefit of hindsight? I see a lot of the information is outdated (including the first line) since the merger with Honeywell Quantum and subsequent new formation of Quantinuum. The obvious solution to create a new page has not worked out. It does not make sense to keep updating this page since most of the updates are about the new org, ie, Quantinuum. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KartikSinghal (talk • contribs) 15:02, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]