Talk:California Proposition 65 list of chemicals

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of California Proposition 65 list of chemicals was copied or moved into User:QuickWittedHare/sandbox#Proposition_65_Reworking with this edit on 01:57, 26 May 2020. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Dividing listings by first letter

I propose that the article listings should be divided by first letter due to the long table. This change would allow for easier finding of a specific material listed. Does anyone object this idea? QuickWittedHare (talk) 03:03, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a good idea, especially as the list grows. BobChemist (talk) 20:04, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keeping list incomplete

Despite the large number of entries in the prop 65 list, is there a compelling reason to leave off some items and keep the list truncated? Otherwise, we have to make value judgements about relevance which to me seem somewhat arbitrary. BobChemist (talk) 20:05, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]