Talk:Calibre (software)

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Requests for information

Request for updated screenshots.

| Ajindustries | Talk Page |

06:28, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Request for pronunciation guide for the name of the software.128.252.7.45 (talk) 19:16, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

promotion / copyvio

I've removed a significant amount of information copy/pasted from http://calibre-ebook.com/about as a WP:COPYVIO. It was also highly promotional. Please don't restore it. Toddst1 (talk) 14:30, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To convert external content sources calibre supports the RSS-Feedreader protocol What kind of protocol is that? What's the advantage of using that protocol over just reading a feed over HTTP?--88.73.15.93 (talk) 16:26, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Version list

It would be useful to have a version list, clarifying what versions are compatible with what operating systems (e.g., it is impossible to find what is the latest Calibre version compatible with OSX Leopard, non-intel, also on the Calibre website). Milligen (talk) 14:14, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Python and C (Qt)"

First of all there is no such thing as a Qt app written in C; the library itself is C++. I am looking through the git repo and so far I don't see any C code. Lots and lots of Python. A small amount of C++. But no C.

OK, now I've run a script:

  19,103 lines of .c code in 36 files.
  45,267 lines of .cpp code in 85 files.
  389,090 lines of .py code in 1231 files.

A large amount of the .c and .cpp files seem to be external libraries packaged together with the code (examples: unrar, LZX codec, qtcurve).

To call it a "Python and C" project still sounds a bit odd.

- 50.0.92.193 (talk) 20:51, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Content server

Why is there no mention at all of the Calibre content server? I consider the OPDS client built into calibre to be one of its primary features. There's also no mention of wireless syncing, though this is a more recent addition. 208.127.80.202 (talk) 22:42, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

'phone home' reference doesn't match text.

'This phone home behavior cannot be disabled, per Kovid Goyal's request.[7]' Perhaps the link has changed, but the link not only does not indicate any such request, the no was to moving an option into a separate preferences / update area. So, I don't understand how this sentence is warranted or authoritated, nor the particular reference given. Not to say the sentence is wrong, merely 'unproven', as presented. (But would have liked to see a 'good' reference, as the inability to turn off updating and any justification for such would be interesting to read.)

BS (talk) 22:17, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sales pitch?

This article does read a bit too much like a sales pitch. I know people are really fond of this program but writing glowingly isn't really helping. I don't know enough about how it works to edit it. 203.34.60.142 (talk) 00:43, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lowercase

Hi User:Philg88, I see the primary source(s) uses lowercase, but secondaries like TechRepublic, Wired use uppercase. Per WP:LOWERCASE / WP:NCCAPS / WP:AT / WP:COMMONNAME is there consensus for the lowercase? In the meantime, I'm going to revert to our default upper. Widefox; talk 13:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Widefox: No big deal, but I have the application running as we speak and it is most indubitably "calibre" in the title bar. Philg88 ^♦talk 14:53, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

yup, me too - they style themselves lowercase. If secondary sources since the lowercase rename have followed then we should revert to lowercase. Regards Widefox; talk 15:19, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Widefox: Agreed. I'll leave it in your capable hands you to do the necessary. Philg88 ^♦talk 05:17, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kovid Goyal

Who can explain why there is no WP-article about Kovid G.? --Delabarquera (talk) 11:42, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What Reliable sources have been written about him? --Cameron Scott (talk) 12:37, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

He is rich and famous and could hire someone to write an article for him, if he wanted to. The fact that he hasn't suggests he would rather spend his money elsewhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.80.118.87 (talk) 19:35, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Calibre (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130618013355/http://www.teleread.com/android/calibre-tools-for-your-android-device/ to http://www.teleread.com/android/calibre-tools-for-your-android-device/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:00, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a horrible program

This is a horrible program. It insists on using its own proprietary "library". The "libraries" in Windows are bad enough. This is a total nightmare. I can't even open a file in this program. Absolutely unacceptable. ---Dagme (talk) 10:45, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]