Talk:Caledonian and Dumbartonshire Junction Railway

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Caledonian and Dumbartonshire Junction Railway article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trains: in UK / in Scotland Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Transport in Scotland (assessed as Mid-importance).

Stewart 22:28, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Name of the railway

The name of the railway included "Dumbartonshire" with an "M", and this article title is incorrect. The county is spelt with an "N" in more recent times, but that's not the point: the railway spelt its name with an M.

This is explained in Casserley page 172, and all the early Parliamentary and trade articles (in Google Books for example) correctly use the M.

Not sure how to handle this, as hundreds (yes hundreds) of Wikipedia articles link to this page under the N title. Even railways in the far north of Scotland link to it, I don't know why. But renaming the article would involve a massive number of edits. Maybe just a redirect.Afterbrunel (talk) 05:29, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why would hundreds of edits be needed? Moving the page to its correct title will create a redirect from the old. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:35, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. There's a terrible lot of "What links here" to the redirect page. Will these get automatically rectified? Afterbrunel (talk) 15:51, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, but there should be no need to alter them all: WP:NOTBROKEN. Start with the navbox (like this), wait for that to pass through the job queue, then see what's left. Only those links which are unpiped or where the visible part of the link has the "Dunbartonshire" spelling need altering. --Redrose64 (talk) 05:31, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Errors in the article

Leaving aside the incorrect title of the railway, this article has some errors and does not portray the history of the company in a grown-up way. I don't like writing "dubious" in the face of the article, but it wasn't "also known as Dumbarton & Balloch Joint Railway" -- that came much later. The idea that the arrival of the turntable was a major event in the history seems strange. I propose to write a better article under the proper company name and convert this page into a redirect.

Comments please? Afterbrunel (talk) 07:02, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have had a go at this. Afterbrunel (talk) 15:52, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]