Talk:Calcium citrate

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This article told me exactly what I wanted to know. I have been in search of citric acid for cooking purposes and sour salt turned out to be the thing I was looking for. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.187.175.68 (talk) 19:12, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the active ingredient in clathrate is calcium carbonate, not calcium citrate. Siddhartha1953 (talk) 05:19, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article in need of attention

because it dont covers the prepration and properties of calcium citrate... thus it must be provided....

Can I have a procedure for the analysis of sodium bicarbonate and sodium citrate when they are in the same solution? Please hlp me out @ yard1ster@yahoo.com.

And can i know what is the benefit of calcium citrate with calcitriol, please get me know at tetramed.pmt@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.17.10.222 (talk) 13:07, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Real reasons article is in need of attention

The article appears accurate for what it contains, but is too narrow in scope, and is poorly sourced for an article on such a basic chemical compound. (There are myriads of scholarly sources on this compound.) And it is unfortunate that the article's most significant paragraph (with regard to length of exposition) is an elaboration of the content of a single primary source on relative bioavailability, of only modest general importance, under the guise of a more expansive explanation of its general biological role (about which we learn nothing). In short, the article does not cover the things a chemical article should, and spends too much time on a minor subject of interest to a particular editor. This is not encyclopedic chemical writing. 2601:246:CA80:3CB5:74A5:20A6:5D83:76ED (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]