Talk:Cadillac V-12

Automobiles Low‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as having no substantive content, because I'm in the initial stages of inserting content. Within a a couple of hours the srticle will have at least as much content as the Cadillac V-16 article it is meant to complement. Sadowski (talk) 03:47, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because any material that has the appearance of violating copyright infringment is being replaced as quickly as possible. Sadowski (talk) 07:58, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The original tagging as a G12 was spot on, but I agree that the wording has been substantially improved. However, I think it is a technical violation to even have material under copyright in the history, although I don't think we normally take action in those cases, with possibly some exceptions. I'll check with one of our experts.--SPhilbrick T 14:30, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Were I to create an article in the future I don't think i would do it this way. I was in a haste and copy and pasted knowing the content was true by heart. Next time I'll sandbox it in a word document first before pasting. This was a trial by error experiment that nevertheless seems to have yielded a reasonably decent product. Thank You.

Sadowski (talk) 08:54, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]