Talk:CUNY School of Law/Archives/2015
This is an archive of past discussions about CUNY School of Law. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Copyrighted Material Permission granted
CUNY School of Law gives its permission to post content from its domain www.law.cuny.edu on its wikipedia page. A confirmation email has been received by permissions@wikimedia.org and responded to (Ticket#2010012610045927). Thank you. Cunylawwebmaster (talk) 16:31, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.law.cuny.edu/about.html and other pages from the law.cuny.edu domain. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MLauba (talk) 11:04, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
POV article
This article reads like an advertisement for CUNY Law, and I suggest a significant rewrite. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.205.242 (talk) 06:55, 9 February 2010 (UTC) The first part that contains praise about the law school should be moved to a new section: "Praise for the law school" Brianlowy (talk) 15:01, 28 June 2011 (UTC)Brian
RE: POV Article
Hello Mr. Lowy,
I see that you have been making edits to the CUNY Law Wikipedia site and made a comment on the Talk page. While it is a public document, we try and keep the piece updated and correct. Are you working on a specific project that leads you to update our entry or are you an alum? Perhaps there is a way to work together. Please get in touch with me so we can discuss your interest and our shared goals. Thank you.
Vivian Todini Executive Director of Institutional Advancement vivian.todini@mail.law.cuny.edu 718-340-4530
Cunylawwebmaster (talk) 14:19, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
File:CUNYLaw2CourtSquare.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
An image used in this article, File:CUNYLaw2CourtSquare.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:CUNYLaw2CourtSquare.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:56, 15 June 2012 (UTC) |
Revision needed
I took it upon myself to reorganize the article into sections in accordance with the guidelines of the College & Universities Wikiproject. I haven't revised the content more than a few touch-ups. This article is in sore need of a revision because of the writing style appearing partial like promotional literature (i.e. boosterism) and not in keeping with Wikipedia's POV policies. It also has a considerable issues with various MOS concerns, linkfarm, and citation issues. Further, seeing that a CUNY official has been involved with the article's maintenance (see comments above) makes me ill-at-ease regarding objectivity vis-a-vis Wikipedia's policies. --ColonelHenry (talk) 03:11, 20 January 2013 (UTC)