Talk:CSS Arkansas

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arkansas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arkansas.

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States / American Civil War Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

MilHist assessment

Appears quite good overall. Coverage is very decent, so have upped that criterion, however:

There are a number of paragraphs without any citations, so that B-Class criterion isn't met.
Not convinced the lists of Federal vessels engaged belong where they are, almost as an afterthought, which spoils the structure criterion -- as they're sourced anyway, best solution may be simply to drop them. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:55, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Losses

A little bit of bias has crept in here:

"Although Arkansas did not destroy any enemy vessels, she inflicted severe losses among the personnel of the Federal fleets."

The losses cited (18 KIA, 50 WIA, 10 MIA) are hardly severe when considering the size of the Federal fleet (18 warships and uncounted support vessels) and its manpower. By comparison, the Arkansnas lost 12 KIA and 18 WIA, which is far more serious when considering they were all lost in a single ship. A simple statement of the losses without editorial comment might be better. 98.255.85.245 (talk) 23:27, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Date format

Respect the existing date format as per MOS:DATERET.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:21, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]