Jump to content

Talk:CQC-6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleCQC-6 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 25, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 2, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the CQC-6 knife (pictured) by Ernest Emerson was first developed for a US Navy SEAL Team, and went on to popularize the concept of the "tactical folding knife"?

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:CQC-6/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:05, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hello, I will be reviewing this article over the next couple days. In the meantime, I will be performing noncontroversial copyedits and other cleanup fixes. Then I will return with my review. I will not fail it if you cannot complete the review in one week; however, I do expect to see work on it or a note explaining why you cannot. Thanks! Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:05, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I should be available. Let me know whatever you need.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 14:18, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]



Overall, this article is decent. It has some issues that need fixing, mainly with regards to referencing.
Lead
  • Design date (in the infobox) is unsourced and does not appear in the article body.
fixed!
  • Number of knives built (also in the infobox) is unsourced.
removed.
  • Quotation marks are not needed around the image caption.
fixed!
Specifications
  • Looks good here. (I will assume that the offline sources provided support the claims in the article.)
History
  • Looks pretty good.
Variants
  • A few early models featured a titanium backspacer, replaced in later years by a backspacer made of G10 fiberglass. Some early CQC-6's featured cutouts in the micarta handle slabs for a small pair of tweezers as found on the Swiss Army Knife. Unreferenced.
fixed, feel free to delete second ref if not needed. Wasn't trying to be cheeky, just felt an online source would add to credibility.
It's perfectly fine! More sources is usually better, as long as you don't do something like: "The CQC-6 has a blade[1][3][7][11][12][13][14]. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:44, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • The fifth and sixth paragraphs are completely unreferenced.
fixed
CQC-7
  • In the image caption, please specify which knife is which.
fixed
References
  • Refs #5 and #27: "pp" stands for "pages". When citing only one page, use "p".
fixed
External links
  • Looks good.
Thanks for taking the time to look, I'll put some more work in on it this afternoon.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 17:12, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Much better! I will now pass the article. Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:47, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    No fair use images, so that does not apply.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Looks good! Thank you for your work! Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:47, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notability?

[edit]

How is this notable enough to be included in Wikipedia? Somebody made a pocketknife. Kortoso (talk) 17:25, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It popularized an entire genre of knives and is credited as being the first of that type and was designed for SEAL Team 6.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 17:30, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on CQC-6. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:13, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:CQC-6&oldid=1201213087"