Talk:CNN v. Trump

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the CNN v. Trump article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Presidential elections / Presidents / Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United States Presidents (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government.

Copy of the Order

Anyone have a link to Judge Kelly's order? It's been reported as a 20-page order, so it's obviously been available to news media, but I haven't seen the document posted as it so often is. It would make a good EL if anyone has a link. TJRC (talk) 01:30, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can't seem to find it. There's a bunch of other court documents popping up when I put the case number into Google though. Hopefully it'll be posted by someone in the media this week.TomCat4680 (talk) 01:17, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently it was not a written order. PACER has a an entry dated 11/16/2018: "Minute Entry and Order for proceedings held before Judge Timothy J. Kelly: Motion Hearing continued and held on 11/16/2018. Oral Ruling GRANTING [docket entry #2] MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, for the reasons stated on the record in open court." So the closest thing to an order to link to would be the November 16 transcript, which is not available on PACER, but is separately orderable starting at $4 per page. TJRC (talk) 22:02, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is [1] the correct transcript? (I downloaded a copy in case it goes offline). Legoktm (talk) 08:08, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that looks like it. TomCat4680 (talk) 17:21, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. Uploaded to Commons and embedded in the article. Legoktm (talk) 20:32, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]