Talk:CBU-97 Sensor Fuzed Weapon

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Untitled

Added requested citation and US Government - Military public domain image of article subject. Jfischer5175 14:27, 27 September 2006 (UTC)jfischer5175[reply]

Picture format

Thank you, Riddley. Still learning the format codes. Jfischer5175 16:21, 27 September 2006 (UTC)jfischer5175[reply]

TV for those who enjoy massacres.

This thingie was featured on Discovery Channel's Future Weapons TV-show and the unit cost is said to be 1 million dollars. Probably ineffective against modern, reinforced top armour tanks like the swedish Leopard 2S, which got about 10 tons of extra protection compared to the basic german version. 91.83.2.192 19:39, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, this is effective against any tank. I think you'll find that the top armor of most any armored vehicle is quite thin. Most armored vehicles have a majority on the front, with less on the sides and rear and the least amount on the top. Jtrainor (talk) 03:05, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes this would rip straight through a Leopard 2S... - Heaney555z (talk) 13:49, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]