Talk:CANT Z.1007 Alcione

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Military history: Aviation / European / Italian / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	European military history task force
	Italian military history task force (c. 500–present)
	World War II task force

Untitled

I will come back to this article latter! There are a couple of contradictory technical specifications that I can see. The design features and history have been fairly well established, but the operational history should be split off and put under its own heading. The operational history should also have information on which groups operated it, where and when. Idsnowdog 03:14, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, agree, but give me time i have only two hands..--Stefanomencarelli 09:18, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CANT or Cant

Which is correct, CANT or Cant? --Red Sunset 19:35, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CANT= Cantiere Navale Triestino. Theorically it's CANT: but usually is called Cant. Why? I don't know. My sources usually quoted Cant, but it 'should' be CANT. Not easy to descern.--Stefanomencarelli 19:53, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you Stefano; there seems to be no simple answer, but in the interests of consistency then perhaps we should apply the "usual" spelling of "Cant". I'll go through the article in due course and alter accordingly if no-one objects. --Red Sunset 21:31, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]