This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
"...and captures the spirit of a sweeter, simpler 1950's style of candy."
Yet the candy is from the gritty, urbane 1930s. I suspect that it was the writer himself who was sweeter and simpler in the 1950s. The rest of the world was not. It was its same old self, the candy included. It would be simpler not to claim that candies have spirits, or that ages have spirits and candies capture them. It would also be easier to write something that sounded encyclopedic rather than ad copy or memories of childhood.
I've removed the bit about the musician Violet Candy from the 'In popular culture' section. 13 monthly listeners on Spotify, 22 SoundCloud subscribers, no presence in the media whatsoever (as of right now) - hardly worthy of inclusion. Seems more like an attempt at self-advertising than anything else (which is forbidden on Wikipedia).
00:49, 4 July 2022 (UTC) Salvapdivad (talk) 00:49, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]