Talk:Cöln-class cruiser/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 14:41, 8 October 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Probably should add state for NIP books.
Added. Parsecboy (talk) 14:10, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
You might consider adding a summary table giving each ship's construction and fate info like I did for C and D class destroyer. I find that it presents the info better for classes with a lot of members. Not a requirement, but just a suggestion.
That's a good idea. Parsecboy (talk) 14:10, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

B. Focused:
Link boilers.
Added. Parsecboy (talk) 14:10, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail: