Talk:Bye Bye (Mariah Carey song)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bye Bye (Mariah Carey song) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Bye Bye (Mariah Carey song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Bye Bye (Mariah Carey song) is part of the E=MC² (Mariah Carey album) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 11, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed
October 12, 2024	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong

Mariah Carey Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mariah Carey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mariah Carey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Mariah CareyWikipedia:WikiProject Mariah CareyTemplate:WikiProject Mariah CareyMariah Carey
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Women in Music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The reason for the "Hang On"

It's been confirmed by her official website as the second single, and it went for adds yesterday (April 7). Therefore, the speedy doesn't apply, and there's no reason for deletion. SKS2K6 (talk) 18:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for rollbacking you, it was an accident due to my clumsy fat fingers operating a mouse too small for them. I see that the single has been confirmed. I will remove the speedy tag. Thanks. SWik78 (talk) 19:06, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The song appears to have already peaked, dropping from #23 to #32 in its second week on the Billboard Hot 100.76.22.201.109 (talk) 00:21, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Someone sabotaged the single's BB peak

'Bye Bye' peaked at #19 on the Billboard Hot 100. Someone changed it wrongly to 14 by citing a wrong source (another chart other than Billboard's). I corrected it. 87.221.4.138 (talk) 15:16, 25 July 2008 (UTC)LaShawnia Hyrse, July 25, 2008.[reply]

Love Story as the next single?

Just like Bye Bye Love Story is weak, I don't understand why they would consider releasing it for the third single while there are stronger ones like Side Effects, For the Record,or I stay in love. That chick is a far better choice for the third release. It's really disappointing! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.111.74.219 (talk) 00:15, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bye Bye musc video

One of the things i wanna now about Bye Bye video is if one of the final scenes when Mariah is singing at a tour, appears Monique Coleman? Please tell me. Pedrovip (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 14:12, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube

I reinstated the section about the YouTube video having become a spontaneous online digital monument for lost loved ones. I think it adds real value to the article. If you disagree, please discuss it here, and don't delete it anonymously and without comment! Captain Chaos (talk) 13:39, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's original research that's somewhat trivial and non-neutral. In order to re-add it, please find a reliable source that states such. SKS (talk) 21:53, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a self evident fact. It has nothing to do with 'original research'. The 'reliable source' is the video itself; if you go there you can see that it has ten thousand comments, most of which are dedications to deceased people. No interpretation necessary. I understand the need for verifiability, but this is ridiculous. It sounds to me more like someone just doesn't agree with me that it's significant, and is hiding behind official policy to enforce their own opinion. Captain Chaos (talk) 12:58, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anyone here who does think it's significant and this section deserves to be in the article? Captain Chaos (talk) 13:09, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bye Bye (Mariah Carey song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 14:13, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Info box

Order of writers is different to that of the Lead.

Lead info

No issues.

Background

No issues.

Composition

(Vocal range is wrong)
No other issues.

Critical reception

"In his review of E=MC2" → You need a "²" here.
"it heavily to "Don't Forget About Us"" → Doesn't need to be wiki-linked again, it was linked in the Composition section.

Chart performance

"the united Kingdom" → Need a capital 'U'
"select part of Europe" → "parts", not "part"
"in its third.[52]" → "In its third week" ?
"each country in charted" → think you mean 'it'.
" It debuted and peaked at number 70 in Germany, and debuted at number eighty-eight on the UK Singles Chart.[48][49] Six weeks later, on July 5, 2008, the song peaked at number thirty, due to the release of the song's music video.[50]" → 70 should be seventy, and I assume you are talking about the UK when you say it peaked at thirty? Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon!
up. Right you are!--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 18:38, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Music video - Background

No issues.

Music video - Synopsis

No issues.

Live performances

"Carey took to Europe to perform on several programs" → You only mention T4, so you should re-word the sentence to fit in with the United Kindgom, as you give two promo appearances for the UK.
"Tamara ones of" → ? Not sure this is mean't to be.
"one of which included a live rendition of "Bye Bye"." Where ? If you are talking about T4, when you should mention with T4 in the same sentence. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 21:25, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Track listings and formats

No issues.

Credits and personnel

No issues.

Release history

Is there no release history table you can put here? For radio adds, digital downloads, CDs?

References

One dead link (Ref 16)
I know you're not going to like this, but its not dead. I don't know why it comes up like that. Click on the link in the article :)--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 23:39, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Why does it do that? Maybe it you remove it, then add it back in and format it again, it will trick the system lol. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 23:41, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Trust me. it won't. I have that same issue on the Mimi page. Its just a simple error :S--CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 03:16, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another great article, on hold. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 16:14, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Passed :) Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 15:28, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bye Bye (Mariah Carey song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091014035356/http://latimesblogs.latimes.com:80/extendedplay/2008/04/the-mariah-care.html to http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/extendedplay/2008/04/the-mariah-care.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:55, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bye Bye (Mariah Carey song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5hFf8iFDu?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.irishcharts.ie%2Fsearch%2Fplacement to http://www.irishcharts.ie/search/placement
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.abramus.com.br/images/image/100maisexecutadas2008.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:24, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bye Bye (Mariah Carey song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120319054750/http://www.hollywoodtoday.net/2008/04/17/carey-hopes-to-come-back-with-huge-start-on-new-release/ to http://www.hollywoodtoday.net/2008/04/17/carey-hopes-to-come-back-with-huge-start-on-new-release/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.irishcharts.ie/search/placement

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:02, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]