Talk:By-elections to the 41st Canadian Parliament

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums

Canada: Governments / Electoral districts Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Governments of Canada.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Electoral districts in Canada.

Etobicoke Centre

The parties have eight days to appeal, so we shouldn't list the by-election until either the deadline passes without an appeal being filed or the Supreme Court decides in Wrzesnewskyj's favour. -Rrius (talk) 00:54, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, we have a restore point so we don't need the material added commented out. Having it there suggests a degree of certainty that it will occur, but we shouldn't prejudge the situation. The appeal must be filed and decided quickly, so let's just be patient. -Rrius (talk) 00:23, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Erin O'Toole

Hey User:Jwkozak91! You asked whether Erin O'Toole was Canadian Army, RCN or RCAF? I checked his [erinotoole.ca website] and it only says Canadian Forces, he was a Sea King pilot, though. He's been retired for a little while now, so it could've been before the name change. Bkissin (talk) 12:15, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination Contests

Hey everybody. I certainly don't want to get into an edit war over the idea of whether nomination contests should be added. It's my opinion, however, that they should be added, as it adds more information to the article. If you look at the article for Ottawa South, you see that the nomination contests are added. Your thoughts? Bkissin (talk) 16:09, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Completely unnecessary, and undue weight. We don't follow a general election this heavily. 117Avenue (talk) 06:29, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on By-elections to the 41st Canadian Parliament. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:46, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on By-elections to the 41st Canadian Parliament. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:34, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]