Talk:Business Ethics (The Office)

Television: Episode coverage / The Office Low‑importance

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This redirect is supported by The Office task force.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Idiocy

This summary sucks and was poorly written. Someone needs to change it. 76.172.157.24 (talk) 05:06, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How helpful of you. Go nuts. Since you seem to care so much, I suggest you get started. DaRkAgE7 _[Talk] 05:36, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dunder Mifflin tolerating and even promoting prostitution

Promoting in that that they don't take action due to profits. Has it been mentioned anywhere that this will return as a future theme for the show or an episode? That is, the company gets busted, etc.

-G —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.67.112.233 (talk) 07:40, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful. That's most likely just a one episode thing, to help move the plot along. Saying anything on the article would be OR/speculation, so this conversation should be taken to a forum elsewhere if you want to discuss it further. DaRkAgE7 _[Talk] 00:18, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dwight's "evil" look

Anyone know why he gave that look after admitting to Jim that he isn't completely ethical? Enigma ^message 07:54, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In case you missed it, the implication was that Dwight had spent the previous 19 minutes intimately with Angela. On the show, the Angela character is engaged to Andy. 75.51.85.233 (talk) 16:27, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, he's been screwing Angela for a while. I didn't make the connection. I thought it had something to do with the current conversation. Enigma ^message 16:35, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, it does relate to the context of the current conversation. Jim asks Dwight about what he was doing for 19 minutes and 48 seconds, Dwight replies, "None of your business.". Jim says, "So I guess that I can assume that was... personal?". (Camera pans to Angela buttoning her shirt, then back to Dwight) Dwight, "Fine." Jim, "So maybe you're not completely ethical, after all?" Dwight, "Yes. Maybe, I'm not." 75.51.85.233 (talk) 16:44, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. Enigma ^message 16:54, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]