Talk:Burton upon Stather
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Burton upon Stather article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
co-ords and repair
[edit]Would someone include co-ords and repair the map? Get it going, data is there in places, needs sorting out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.65.96.138 (talk • contribs) 11:44, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fixed the coords. --Sama74 (talk) 20:47, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Burton upon Stather. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100330190854/http://www.burton-upon-stather.org.uk:80/History/history.html to http://www.burton-upon-stather.org.uk/History/history.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:41, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
Hyphenated or not?
[edit]"Burton upon Stather"? Or "Burton-upon-Stather"?
The article title is unhyphenated. But current displayed uses within the article had been hyphenated.
All the working "references" and all the working "external links" resolve to sites using the unhyphenated form. None shows the hyphenated form.
Additionally The North Lincs regional government website is unhyphenated. Likewise unhyphenated is the local BBC weather page.
The only Google hits that are hyphenated seem to be the name of the primary school, and Zoopla/Rightmove housemove listings. These housemove listings would seem less authorities than (for instance) the local regional government.
So given that all the existing (working) links, plus the official local government website, plus the BBC use the unhyphenated form, and that the only exceptions seems to be housemove websites and one school website. I am normalising the place-name to the unhyphenated form.
Feline Hymnic (talk) 20:35, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- I wont argue with you, I have no sources. The hyphenated village sign was outside my house at the edge of the village, and I attended the hyphenated village school too. They taught us to hyphenate. My parents moved away from there in 2006. The village sign has since moved and been renewed with the expanding village borders, and isn't legible on Google Earth. The house was just over the top of the Trent cliff (Burton hills to us) from the Flixborough disaster about a mile away. Scary for me alone in the house on a Saturday afternoon. -Roxy the grumpy dog. wooF 20:55, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Genuine local knowledge and custom is also important. In that respect, as a local to the village, you know far more than me who has never visited (although understandably WP policies don't really go for such "on the ground" but unreferenced things). And there is at least one decent source, the Primary School, which uses the hyphenated form. Suppose we also include the hyphenated form as an alternative spelling, and use the Primary School's website as the cited source? I think we could make a good case for "B u S (sometimes known as B-u-S)" with the school as cite for the hyphenated form. Would that work for you? And, while we're here, do you happen to have, or know of, a useable image of the village sign? Feline Hymnic (talk) 21:47, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have just added something along those lines to include both versions of the name. Feline Hymnic (talk) 12:32, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- Genuine local knowledge and custom is also important. In that respect, as a local to the village, you know far more than me who has never visited (although understandably WP policies don't really go for such "on the ground" but unreferenced things). And there is at least one decent source, the Primary School, which uses the hyphenated form. Suppose we also include the hyphenated form as an alternative spelling, and use the Primary School's website as the cited source? I think we could make a good case for "B u S (sometimes known as B-u-S)" with the school as cite for the hyphenated form. Would that work for you? And, while we're here, do you happen to have, or know of, a useable image of the village sign? Feline Hymnic (talk) 21:47, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
- Start-Class WikiProject Cities articles
- All WikiProject Cities pages
- Start-Class UK geography articles
- Low-importance UK geography articles
- Start-Class England-related articles
- Low-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages
- Start-Class Lincolnshire articles
- Low-importance Lincolnshire articles
- WikiProject Lincolnshire articles