This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lincolnshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lincolnshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LincolnshireWikipedia:WikiProject LincolnshireTemplate:WikiProject LincolnshireLincolnshire
The population figure of 600 may have been sourced from here:[1] Burton Waters does have a "built up area" designation but because the population figure is below 500 according to this ONS source,[2] (type "Burton Waters" in search box) it doesn't get reported on citypopulation.de because that website doesn't report figures less than 500.[3] Not sure what to do so would welcome advice. The choices seem to be stick with the 600 figure and put in a citation to Streetmap; put in 460 and cite to ONS or omit a population figure altogether. Given the rather strange shape of the ONS area, my own view is the 600 figure is the more accurate, however because of uncertainty over the reliability of both figures, I think it preferable on balance to not show a population figure for Burton Waters. Pinging @PamD, who placed the citation needed tag and @DragonofBatley who I believe put the 600 figure in the article. Rupples (talk) 12:27, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]