Talk:Burton Albion F.C.

Football: England / English non-league Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the English non-league task force (assessed as Low-importance).

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

First Match

Article claims Chester played in first match at the new stadium in July 2005, but most news stories recently have a match against Man Utd reserves as the first. Grunners 14:40, 8 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The first match at the Pirelli WAS against Chester. The Man Utd reserves game was the *Official* opening, but came four months after the ground first started to be used. So technically they're both correct.

Out of Proportion?

Isn't the discussion of the Man Utd match a bit out of proportion with the rest of the article?

No not at all. The Man Utd matches represent the most important period for the club both in footballing terms and the financial stability of the club. It would be churlish to suggest otherwise. Captain McVitie 16:51, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I agree with the first question. Yes it is important but doesn't fit into the history naturally. My other, and biggest, issue with this article is that the club's longest serving manager of 10 years - Nigel Clough - barely gets a mention. There is too much recentism in the article. --Higgsbozone (talk) 21:49, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how it's evolved in the last 16 months, but as of now, given the tag still remains... it should be clearly pointed out... the "recentism" slant isn't because there's too much material on the recent team... but because there's a bit too little on the earlier team. Three paragraphs (nine pretty small sentences, at that) on the past couple seasons is comparable to the amount given even at poorer performing, lower tier clubs. And the years before that aren't bad either really. Maybe could cut a sentence or two from the Manchester United game (though to be fair, that's not the top recency, and is a valid big deal). But the real need is someone who knows a lot about the history of the club to go through and add a sentence or two more about each decade, and then it seems to me (someone entirely impartial to the team, neither fan nor foe) that it'd be good.

JeopardyTempest (talk) 22:16, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nigel Clough

The biggest issue I have with the entire "History" section is that there is barely a mention of Nigel Clough. He was the longest serving manager in the history of the club and secured them promotion in his time there. I am not a Burton Albion fan but surely there is one who can fill this in correctly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Higgsbozone (talk • contribs) 21:50, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

History section

As the history section is being expanded, would it make sense to introduce sub-headings to make it more readable? One option would be sub-headings which reflect Burton's progress through the leagues (e.g. non-league period/league football, or maybe pre-conference/conference/league 2/league 1/championship). Another possibility is to present the history by manager (e.g. Clough era, Pesch era etc.). Perhaps some combination of the two would work as well?Jamesbuchanan (talk) 12:59, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment it's so short (6 paragraphs) that there doesn't seem much point in splitting it up. Ilikeeatingwaffles (talk) 13:42, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Burton Albion F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100825150136/http://www.staffordshire.gov.uk:80/news/pirellisealofapproval.htm to http://www.staffordshire.gov.uk/news/pirellisealofapproval.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:22, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on Burton Albion F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Burton Albion F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Architect for new stadium

The Architect for the new stadium was Ian Goodwin from Rothera Goodwin Architects and not Jon Hawkeye as stated in Wikepedia 2.222.52.55 (talk) 19:04, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

11,000 as the record number of away fans at Old Trafford?

Really? Everton brought 14,000 for the cup-tie in 1957; City brought 13,000 for the cup-tie in 1987; Forest brought 13,000 for the cup-tie in 1989. I don't care that the source is the BBC: it's incorrect. Scherben808 (talk) 23:51, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]