Jump to content

Talk:Burrabazar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As I remarked on the image labelled "Jewish Synagogue": If the building in this picture is a Jewish synagogue then I think an explanation is in order for the Catholic Christian imagery and symbolism saturating the facade. Note: crosses over the main entryway, gable, and towers. Also the painting on the pediment of a crowned Virgin Mary holding Jesus, surrounded by two monastic Christian saints and then two angels. If this is a synagogue, it was certainly not buit as one, since all the Christian iconography and imagery has not been changed in accordance with Jewish principles, as Jews believe neither in saints, the Virgin Mary, or Jesus. Everything about this building from its baroque styling, imagery, and crosses suggests that this is a Catholic Church and not a Jewish Synagogue. 64.148.49.50 (talk) 14:22, 1 July 2009 (UTC)John Fischer

Retrieved from "http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/File_talk:Kolkata_Jewish_Synagogue.jpg" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.148.49.50 (talk) 15:25, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I think you are right. It is the 'Portuguese Church'. Somehow the photographer who uploaded it into wikipedia, confused it with a synagogue which is located on the same road.--GDibyendu (talk) 17:30, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Burrabazar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:44, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Burrabazar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:15, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]