Talk:Burger King grilled chicken sandwiches/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Zanimum (talk · contribs) 20:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seems fairly solid, and I'm almost done the two GANs I'm currently reviewing, so I'll take this as my next project. -- Zanimum (talk) 20:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TYVM, --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 01:18, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Passing "Product description", "Advertising" (interesting how much info there is on the campaigns).

"Notes" is entirely about their trademarks, so why is it separate from "Trademarks"? -- Zanimum (talk) 02:45, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Notes section is for the citations for the trademark information. Instead of having half a dozen individual inline citations in the text for each nation's intellectual property authority, I chose to put one simple, small link in the text and put the citations in the notes section. It is an editing and aesthetics decision on my part and is based on the structure used in the Whopper article. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 18:54, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's fair, thanks! Passing "Trademarks" and "Notes". -- Zanimum (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to wait for you to finish looking over the article before working on the suggestions you make. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 08:41, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will finish this this week, I have a death in the family that requires my focus elsewhere for the next few days.--Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 08:59, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Second round

Done--Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 20:18, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Drat, I must have gremlins in my computer. I reviewed more of the article this morning, but can't find where I save it.

Passing "BK Broiler", "Chicken Whopper", "BK Baguette", "TenderGrill".

Competitive products

Not done I don't think "By early-1991" needs a hyphen.
I'm using the Chicago Manual of Style, which states that this type of format is hyphenated in noun and adjective forms (adjective-noun).
Not done Not necessary, but you might consider a bit of sentence or two more on KFC, considering the reference in the BK Broiler section. Not necessary for a pass, but something to consider.
That is an interesting idea, but the amount of research would be rather time consuming.

Images all pass.

Lead, infobox, references remain unreviewed. -- Zanimum (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Third round

Done --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 20:18, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead and infobox are passes, I'll just make sure there's nothing heinous in the references tonight. -- Zanimum (talk) 22:31, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done The book excerpt on GMA's site: what does that have to do with Ad Age? They're mentioned once way down in the article.
I have no idea what happened with that citation, it was all messed up.
Done Burger King menu - Middle east --> Middle East.
I fixed all instances so that they read Middle East.
Not done Did any media outlet use the Center for Science in the Public Interest press release?

The Chicago Tribune did but there is no direct link. The site returns a 404 error. The other sites were not reliable.

Not done There should probably be a [sic] in the "Franchisees on BK Kid's Club" title, as the apostrophe is unnecessary.
That is the name of the article title, with the apostrophe.

Otherwise, the sources all seem to be quality.

I think that's it for the article. -- Zanimum (talk) 22:15, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So, how goes? -- Zanimum (talk) 18:34, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm finished. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 05:33, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, was checking on the sic on the help desk, got a reply, but the last couple days have been an ice storm where I am. Passing. -- Zanimum (talk) 18:10, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.