Talk:Bump and run (auto racing)

NASCAR Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject NASCAR, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to NASCAR. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, you can visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.NASCARWikipedia:WikiProject NASCARTemplate:WikiProject NASCARNASCAR articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contribute to the project:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Wrong Information

The article should describe Bump & Run (contacting someone in a turn to force a spin), not Bump Drafting (contact to mutually increase speed).Mustang6172 08:25, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I rewrote it today. Royalbroil 15:43, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was No move Duja► 09:15, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could this and similar "driver tactics" descriptions be merged into a single article? DMcMPO11AAUK/Talk/Contribs 13:54, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As this is the only such article at present, I'm marking this as a move / renaming discussion. DMcMPO11AAUK/Talk/Contribs 01:37, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. They should remain separate so that an article can wikilink to the specific tactic. Royalbroil 14:39, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't a wikilink for the tactic redirect to a page listing all such tactics? Finding the tactic in the page contents should be a minor concern. My concern is that there's so little to say about each tactic that it becomes a collection of many pages of trivial articles. At the very least, if they are to be kept as multiple separate articles, "Nascar tactics" should be a category so that people can find them all in one place. IMO an article about "Nascar Tactics" is more encyclopaedic than a collection of trivial articles, one per tactic, describing each tactic in two or three paragraphs each. DMcMPO11AAUK/Talk/Contribs 16:23, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A separate article on each tactic allows it to grow. I'm sure that there are several notable examples of bump and run (for example). Linking to anchor tags in the middle of a different article is cumbersome and requires medium level wikicoding beyond what an average Wikipedian would do. I don't have a problem with a NASCAR tactics category, although the Category:NASCAR terminology doesn't have very many entries. Please be careful about throwing around the word "trivial", because what is unimportant trivia to you is not trivial to others. Royalbroil 17:59, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe that there is a demonstrable need to wikilink to individual tactics. If each tactic is to be described in a couple of paragraphs, then it is more encyclopaedic to have a single article discussing the various tactics, rather than dictionary definitions of each tactic. DMcMPO11AAUK/Talk/Contribs 01:37, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will bring up this proposed move at WikiProject NASCAR, since it affects numerous articles in the WikiProject. Obviously we completely disagree about the proposed merge. Royalbroil 04:02, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Eventually we'll stumble upon tactics used in other forms of racing, and that'll just lead to some kerfuffle about where the information belongs.Mustang6172 07:42, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Tactics should not be capitalized. 132.205.44.5 21:43, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bump and run (auto racing). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:11, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]