Talk:Bulnesia sarmientoi

September 2005

This does not look right. Surely Bulnesia sarmientoi and Bulnesia arborea both are good species? Brya 10:08, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

AFAIK the two names are synonyms. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 15:23, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a monograph? Both are pretty widely used, as separate species. Brya 20:39, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just beginning to see that... I got confused due to this. The main description I wrote, and the picture as well, is definitely B. sarmientoi, though I gather that B. arborea is very similar. What do you suggest? Do you have material to write a separate article, or should we move this to a common name and clear up the matter of the two species in the text? --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 00:27, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they are often mentioned together. The wood is traded together also. You could leave it as it is, just delete the synonym (twice), make a note that Bulnesia arborea is very similar and move everything on the wood properties either to a new entry or below a new heading (perhaps "Verawood"). As the use in the Chaco will refer to Bulnesia sarmientoi only this may not be easy to layout. Perhaps, the easiest thing is to have an entry Bulnesia with a heading for wood and a listing ("principal species") with brief notes for each species. Brya 17:00, 30 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A quick google check reveals a third species Bulnesia retama, and also some dispute over the spelling of B. sarmientoi, with several sources (including the USDA plants database) spelling it Bulnesia sarmienti - MPF 16:09, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

8 April 2008

The Spanish version of this page lists this species' endangerment level as "EN", while it's listed as the considerably less endangered "CD" on this page. Anybody know which is more accurate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.101.72.105 (talk) 03:52, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

13 April 2008

Verawood redirects here. The folks at Global Wood Source seem to think Verawood refers to Gymnanthes lucida. If they're right, perhaps Verawood needs to be a disambiguation page linking to the various woods that the name refers to? 69.12.141.101 (talk) 05:39, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

What is the Janka hardness of this wood? I have seen it listed as anywhere between 3000 and 4600. As it is a trade wood, this information is important both in talking about its uses and in comparing to other trade woods. Anonymous user 19:53, 30 June 2009. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.16.100.138 (talk)

February 2014

I'm convinced that there is a spelling error in the title of this article, according to the literature it should spell Bulnesia sarmienti, not sarmientoi. Compare IPNI: / International Plant Name Index - Bulnesia sarmienti --131.188.188.209 (talk) 14:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bulnesia sarmientoi.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Bulnesia sarmientoi.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:10, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bulnesia sarmientoi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:49, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]