Talk:Bullseye (British game show)

Darts Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Darts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Darts-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DartsWikipedia:WikiProject DartsTemplate:WikiProject DartsDarts articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: British / Game shows Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Television game shows task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Bullseye (British game show) is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This information about when the show started in incorrect. I watch bullseye back programmes every day and have done for years and just watched a programme 5.30am-6am challenge Freeview from 1971 with the year MCMLXX1 dated for 1971. I knew instantly before the year that this wasn't 1980's with the clothing attire being worn and the old set on bullseye that it wasn't 80's. I've known wiki and Google keep stating wrong info about bullseye running from only 1981-95. Please amend. Nothing worse than getting first series of bullseye wrong and incorrect info. C.A 20.9.24.

"Jim Bowen was not asked back to present the show, possibly due to racist comments that he had made earlier in 2002 on a local BBC radio show he was presenting. Following these comments he told the Lancashire Evening Telegraph that he expected the incident would end his career."

"Possibly" = idle speculation. I personally find it unlikely, as I don't recall there being a huge controversy over Bowen's comments, even at the time - certainly nowhere near the fuss that followed Ron Atkinson's infamous remarks (which incidentally did not end Atkinson's TV career).

Bear in mind that Bowen made his remarks on a local radio programme around four years ago. I don't think many people would even remember the incident unless it was pointed out to them. Also, as the Jim Bowen article notes, the incident did not stop him from appearing on the Phoenix Nights show and in Peter Kay's "Amarillo" music video.

Do we even know whether or not Bowen was asked to present the new series? I mean, he may have simply declined to take part, or may have wanted more money to appear than the production company was willing to pay. AdorableRuffian 16:56, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, nobody has bothered to defend these comments or offer sources in the 3+ years since I posted those remarks (or 8 years since the alleged "racist" incident), and I have deleted this unfounded and scurrilous speculation about Bowen's lack of involvement in the later series. AdorableRuffian (talk) 23:49, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Clark

While this section is top comedy it's obviously nonsense (whether it has been in a book or not, and let's face it, if it has the writer was taking the piss). However, someone's clearly determined to have their bit of fun and I can't be bothered to edit it. --Richard Clegg 15:50, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can be bothered to edit it. I have to say though I was amused when I realised it was rubbish after checking the book... NotMuchToSay 18:03, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Update - after looking through the edit history, I notice that this section has been removed and reinstated on a number of occasions (once by the original poster). I would 'love' this to be true, but unfortunately it isn't. The page in question talks about gender and racial balances at the BBC. Neither 'Alan Clarke' nor 'Bullseye' are mentioned in the index. In any case, Dyke was at LWT during this period.

This section would go well on Unencyclopedia, however!

As an aside, it does show that any 'source' on Wikipedia can be absolute rubbish... NotMuchToSay 20:35, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are quite right of course, the Alan Clark section is completely made up. I hope you did not go to the expense of buying Gregg Dyke’s book just to research this point? Anyhow, it was fun whilst it lasted…now then, I’m sure I read somewhere that Peter Sutcliffe once appeared on an episode of 3-2-1… Frostrupp 19:09, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, well, thanks for making me laugh, Frostupp! (the exchanges between editors in the history section is particularly funny). I do seriously think this belongs on Unencyclopedia or some other spoof Wiki. I didn't go to the expense of buying the book - I got it last Christmas, though I haven't got round to reading it! NotMuchToSay 22:37, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you are not out of pocket. Frostrupp 20:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bullseye tv.jpg

Image:Bullseye tv.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:01, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright vio?

Do we need the notice (which implies the whole existing article is a problem) when the problem section was removed at the same time? Seems to me that merely removing the problem text would be sufficient. Probably only some of the removed text counts anyway, mostly what was removed was a list of quoted catchphrases - it is inevitable that these are worded the same everywhere they are quoted. --BrucePodger (Lets have a beer) 09:01, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion

To remove the two sections of copyrighted text from http://www.ukgameshows.com/page/index.php?title=Bullseye added by Coolest Kid20, I reverted the article to the last version before that user edited the article. This reversion restores categories and other information removed in the interim.

The user who added these sections has been accused of sock puppetry at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Coolest Kid20. If edits are made to this article that resemble his, please list those editors there under 'Suspected sockpuppets'. Thanks. KrakatoaKatie 21:41, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bully's Star Prize Gamble

"From the series 11 onward.." - really? Or should this read "from series 2 onward.." like so many of the other alterations that were made in the show? Harfarhs (talk) 18:38, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to the prize, it was shared. If it was a trip is was usually for 4 people (probably the two winners plus their spouses) so the line about it not being made clear could really be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.32.65.183 (talk) 22:58, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Spikey had appeared as a contestant on the show in the 1980s

This claim is bullshit, isn't it? Probably made by a lunatic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.124.58.233 (talk) 16:49, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 4 January 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Non-contested move (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 12:10, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bullseye (1981 British game show) → Bullseye (British game show) – There is only one British game show called "Bullseye", no need to disambiguate. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:09, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.