Talk:Build-A-Bear Workshop

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 April 2009. The result of the discussion was Speedy keep per WP:SNOW.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Toys Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toys, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of toys on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ToysWikipedia:WikiProject ToysTemplate:WikiProject ToysToys articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Toys To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Barbie Queen of the Prom, Eve The Second Genesis CCG, More...
Assess : Rate the Unassessed Toys articles and Unknown-importance Toys articles.
Expand : Expand the doll pages, Expand Larami article
Infobox : Toys articles needing infoboxes
Photo : Request images that are needed from Wikipedia requested photographs of toys to included in each articles.
Stubs : work on stubs in Category:Toy stubs
Other : * Tag the talk pages of Toys-related articles with the {{WikiProject Toys}} banner.
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Toys articles needing attention

St. Louis Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject St. Louis, a project to build and improve articles related to St. Louis and the surrounding metropolitan area. We invite you to join the project and contribute to the discussion.St. LouisWikipedia:WikiProject St. LouisTemplate:WikiProject St. LouisSt. Louis articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Missouri Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
Stub	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Stub‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Stub This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Untitled (feminist)

"Build-A-Bear stores have been criticized because it is supposedly targeting only female customers in its recent years. None of this has yet to be proved."

Where did this come from? Is there a source for this? Msw 17:43, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Um Yah, there's no source for this nonsense... Jmole (talk) 00:48, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Although this is not official and the store does recieve a lot of male costomers, the majority of the clothing products on offer (in the uk at least) are targeted at a female audiance. It is one of the main complaints which the store recieves and they are currently introducing more boy friendly outfits and uni-sex outfits More tea mr miyagi? (talk) 17:46, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled (trivia)

I have a huge problem with the quote someone added under trivia: "During the "Livestrong" fad, Build-A-Bear manufactured sold a renition of Nike's yellow bracelet, but took some of the profit for themselves" Not only is there a spelling error, but there is no reference at all to support this claim. Until someone comes up with one, I'm deleting it from the page. Sam927 19:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy Section

I've added a section to explain the Brown Bear Factory lawsuit, and settlement agreement as detailed by U.s. News and World Report [1]. Brown Bear Factory's claims are printed, as is Maxine Clark's response.--Sodium N4 05:09, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's Just The Correct thing to do.

- Wikipedia - — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.6.90.227 (talk) 18:16, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional Advertisements on Wikipedia

I'm removing the line:

The August 2007 McDonald's Build-a-Bear Workshop Minis come with a coupon that is good for a paper "Beararmoire" at any Build-a-Bear store. Coupon expires December 31, 2007.

from the Trivia section. This is not encyclopedic, and simply reads like an advertisement, especially with the reference to the coupon expiring. Build-a-bear employees are welcome to add important, NPOV, error correction, info, regarding their company to this page, but please keep the limited time offers somewhere else. --Sodium N4 05:09, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added a couple of advert tags so hopefully the more "promotional" parts of the article can get cleaned up. I don't quite understand the purpose of the "Famous Bears" section. Why are these bears famous? --Sodium N4 05:46, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

VTB vs Build A Bear

I removed the line:

Vermont Teddy Bear has a Make a Friend for Life area. VTB sued Build-a-Bear's parent company, Tyco, for copyright infringement, the result was Build a Bear was not to open any stores in the state of Vermont under Opposition No. 91115198 (December 17, 2004).

From the "Other Stores" section. That section is for BBW related stores only, and after reading the opposition referenced (91115198) at the USPTO[2] it appears this is an overly simplified version of events. VTB claimed patent infringment regarding the use of a "heart" inserted into a bear when it is constructed (ironically one of the same ideas Basic Brown Bear Factory claimed was lifted from them). The result was that there was no infringement and VTB has asked for reconsideration and was denied.[3] I am not deeply familiar with this case, so if anyone can reference the claim that this suit prevented BBW from opening any stores in the state of Vermont that would be great, then the section can be fleshed out and possibly placed under "Controversies".--Sodium N4 20:25, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History

I am curious what other people think on this. There is multiple sections that mention specialized stuffed animals that were featured to celebrate a movie or a birthday of some sort (i.e. Surfs Up, Cat in the Hat, etc). I do not see how these are important to the history of the company. The same goes for the Happy Meal Toys. On the Walt Disney company page they don't list the dates and toys that they have had featured in McDonald's Happy Meals. Does anyone else agree with me on this? Dwtootles (talk) 15:29, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Deletion

This may be a controversial deletion, as it may meet WP:CORP. AfD if you want. — X S G 07:06, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May meet WP:CORP? Are you kidding me? There is not one independent source significantly mentioning the company. That doesn't meet the notability requirements by a long shot. Steven Walling (talk) 07:12, 22 September 2008 (UTC) Also fun to take to the park!!![reply]

Hard to tell. I am sure lots love that company. I am with you, but think you should rest aside a little (but see next by me). I pretty much agree with you but with some work, if they stop padding their own promotion and let it stand as an encyclopaedic article, I don't think it should be deleted. SimonTrew (talk) 17:55, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The US News article that I cited when I started the controversies section years ago (regarding patent infringment) is certainly an independant source. -Sodium N4 (talk) 11:00, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Corporate vandalism

It seems to me to becoming fairly apparent, though I could not prove it, that Build-a-Bear is sabotaging this page (and the article). There is one around the corner I think might play the same tactics on them. All legal of course. See how they like it.

I am not a total idiot, but like to stick up for civil liberties. SimonTrew (talk) 17:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pudsey Bear

In UK, they are selling Pudsey Bears for £15. £5 goes to BBC Children In Need. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.199.115 (talk) 18:02, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Who wrote the first part

It sounds like it was written by a 12 year old. Whallah? Misingnoglic (talk) 19:01, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Build-A-Bear Workshop. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110227031231/http://www.stlzoo.org:80/supportthezoo/zoomerchandise/shopatthezoo.htm to http://www.stlzoo.org/supportthezoo/zoomerchandise/shopatthezoo.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional content and unverified references

There were a number of instances where information was unverifiable, including for specific products. I’ve removed those that were not verified by a citation.

Additionally, I revised and expanded the section on the “pay your age” controversy to focus more on company-wide impacts rather than effects seen in individual stores, and added citations and details for the Build-A-Bear video game series. --DarkerBlue599 (talk) 19:03, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]