Talk:Bufo

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bufo article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Amphibians and Reptiles Mid‑importance

	Bufo is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Toad Bites

"The effect on people, bitten by a toad, is a painful swelling of the skin." Since when has there been a problem with toads biting people? --Aaron Walden 03:28, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could find no reference to toad bites producing any such symptoms in humans, either. Removed it. Tjunier 07:05, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Latin

Which declension is bufo? According to one search tool, it is masculine singular nominative, yet I cannot find it in the declension tables. Rintrah 07:57, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. Rintrah 16:41, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction: classification of the Natterjack Toad

This article puts the Natterjack Toad in the genus Bufo, while the article Natterjack Toad puts it in the genus Epidalea. I propose the classification is rectified here. See the discussion at Talk:Natterjack Toad. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 10:16, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

British Toads

Hi, I was wondering whether lengthily dwelling on what types of toads inhabit the British Isles, while only very, very briefly mentioning types of toads found elsewhere in the world does not exhibit a pro-British bias; now, I would have edited the page myself, but I'm not a specialist; so, if anyone could add these bits of information, that would be awesome! Thanks, Hobbitte 00:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)Hobbitte[reply]

I think this is rubbish they don't actually give lots of info on on bufo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.112.124 (talk) 15:04, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Incilius

I don't know about other (sub)genera, but several authorities, including the IUCN and the AMNH appear to follow Frost's revisions, considering Incilius as a separate genus. On what basis is therefore the claim made that "most herpetologists are retaining the use of Bufo at this time"? — Yerpo ^Eh? 11:16, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Try this one endorsed by three major societies: The Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, The Herpetologists’ League.

Crother, BI (2000) Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles North of Mexico, with Comments Regarding Confidence in our Understanding. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Herpetological Circulars, Herpetological Circular No. 29.

Dger (talk) 23:53, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if a 12 years old source is relevant here... — Yerpo ^Eh? 14:31, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Here's the updated version.:

Crother, BI (2012) Scientific and Standard English Names of Amphibians and Reptiles North of Mexico, with Comments Regarding Confidence in our Understanding. Seventh edition. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles. Herpetological Circular No. 39.

Dger (talk) 17:23, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New species, Incilius aurarius

Please add Incilius aurarius to the list, aka Cuchumatan Golden Toad. Source: Mendelson, Joseph. "A New Golden Toad (Bufonidae: Incilius) from Northwestern Guatemala and Chiapas, Mexico." Journal of Herpetology 46.4 (2012): 473-79.--Animalparty-- (talk) 22:06, 23 December 2013 (UTC) People are apparently confusing it with the extinct Golden Toad of Monteverde.[reply]

Very outdated taxonomy

This page seems to have been strongly influenced by the now-minority view retaining Bufo, but I don't know enough about Bufonid taxonomy to thoroughly re-do this. Anyone up for it? HCA (talk) 16:17, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bufo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726155045/http://www.cnah.org/pdf_files/1225.pdf to http://www.cnah.org/pdf_files/1225.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:38, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]