Talk:Buffalo–Niagara Falls metropolitan area

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western New York (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

The map on this page indicates an incorrect county. The county highlighted in light blue is Chautauqua county, not Cattaraugus county. Cattaraugus county is the county directly to the east of Chautauqua county.

Thank you, and sorry for the mistake. I have fixed it now.--Pharos 02:13, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2011 Population Estimate

1,135,509 population as of April 1, 2010 Census
1,135,198 population as of July 1, 2010 Estimate
1,133,240 population as of July 1, 2011 Estimate

Ross --208.107.212.115 (talk) 08:00, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Buffalo–Niagara Falls metropolitan area. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110324073045/http://2010.census.gov:80/2010census/data/ to http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:59, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Buffalo–Niagara Falls metropolitan area. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:45, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RfC about the 3 separate regional articles

I know these are not highly trafficked articles, but we have this article, Niagara Frontier, and Buffalo Niagara Region all representing (practically) the same thing. Western New York is a separate topic, as it is separated from Upstate New York, but why does the Buffalo metro (because this is the focus city) need 3 separate articles to articulate its locale? Having lived here for 20 years and as a general editor, I can say that Western New York is a geographical article, as is Southern Tier, while the other two are political oriented. Buffaboy ^talk --Relisting. Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:18, 9 March 2017 (UTC) Note: RFC was originally started on 00:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment What am I supposed to do? Determine if th two should be merged? It's not clear why the RfC is being held. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 16:29, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm primarily trying to see which of the articles should be merged, yes. Buffaboy ^talk 00:26, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ok thanks, I will look at the articles. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 00:54, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment to me, it looks like Niagara Frontier isn't a close match since it runs far west to Ohio, but it is a stub of basically conveying the meaning of a War of 1812 term so should be merged into that article. The other two seem like might have a valid geographic vice administrative separation so I'd leave them. Markbassett (talk) 02:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree - Niagara Frontier and Buffalo Niagara Region appear to overlap, but don't seem to have quite the same boundaries. PK T(alk) 13:45, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Niagara Frontier into Buffalo Niagara Region. Or Markbassett's comment above. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 16:26, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisting I have relisted this as it could do with some more responses. I am notifying related Wikiprojects right now. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 13:18, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge the three articles into one (I know this region well) The three topics are not identical but it would be easy to explain the differences in boundaries. This is not a topic of great interest so it does not warrant three articles. Just one. Peter K Burian (talk) 14:00, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Niagara Frontier and Buffalo Niagara Region are currently not viable as even stub articles. They cite no sources. I see no problem with a merge to the most developed article. I do agree that if a merge happens, the new article should list various names for the same and similar regional concepts, and set those names as redirects to the main article. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:10, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK, maybe that is a better idea; merge only Niagara Frontier and Buffalo Niagara Region Peter K Burian (talk) 17:57, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge all I'd support merging Niagara Frontier into Buffalo Niagara Region but this article about the metro area could be merged into the Buffalo Niagara Region as well, with content separated into subsections. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:13, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I would suggest merging these articles so that they can be more easily monitored and integrated. -Darouet (talk) 20:38, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]