Jump to content

Talk:Budhia Singh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Controversy in India

[edit]

(The original poster left no headline. I made up one. --Netizen 16:09, 8 May 2006 (UTC))[reply]
There is debate going on in India...How far it is good to encourage to run a three years old boy.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajeshroshan (talkcontribs) 09:41, 5 May 2006 (See diff)


article on budhia

[edit]

The Asian Pacific Post has an article on Budhia Singh. I don't know what the best is for pulling info and citing is. I'll add it as an external link to the article for now at least.

Go, Budhia! DominicLepiane 20:30, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

clarification

[edit]

Budhia wasnt "bought back" by Biranchi Das, in the documentary on Channel Five (UK) it was cited that he was adopted by Biranchi Das and his family. -- RND  T  C  21:18, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He was first just living with Das, then he was adopted by Das, then he became well known and conflict between Das and local governement arised. Then he was kidnapped back by his mother and lived in the slum again. Then he was sold for 800 roepie to another person. That person beated Budhia (at least that was claimed) and he was bought back by Das for 800 roepie and went living with his mother again, the kidnapping might also have been after this buying back. But it was his mother who sold him initially. I guess the adoption was never put on any paper. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 14:15, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:33, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDIA Banner/Orissa Addition

[edit]

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag TALK2ME 02:59, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyedit

[edit]

I have removed some of the references as they did not contain the information in the article. Any material that has a reference should be found in the text of the cited articles, books or web sources.

I have also added some cns as there are some points which need references. These are not "drive by tagging", as this is a blp it needs to have citations for material that is controversial or could be defamatory. Chaosdruid (talk) 16:04, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the information in stated in the documentairy linked on the bottom of the article. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 14:16, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That just isn't good enough. Each claim must be individually cited, or it will be removed. Skinsmoke (talk) 16:23, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What a terrible article

[edit]

Rubbish like this is why I gave up my adminship and left WP. 124.168.239.37 (talk) 11:54, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Budhia Singh. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:18, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]