Talk:Buddhist art

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Buddhist art article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 506.5 days

Buddhist art is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 6, 2005.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 27, 2005	Featured article candidate	Promoted
February 15, 2006	Featured article review	Kept
March 18, 2007	Featured article review	Demoted

Current status: Former featured article

Buddhism High‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is a selected article on the India portal, which means that it was selected as a high quality India-related article.

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

South Asia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Asia, which aims to improve the quality and status of all South Asia-related articles. For more information, please visit the Project page.South AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject South AsiaTemplate:WikiProject South AsiaSouth Asia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Archives

Index

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 506.5 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Philippines part

I think Philippines part on this article more proper to be placed in Buddhism in the Philippines, since Philippines has only less significant or small amount of archelogical remnant which relate with Buddhism, besides Buddhism was never became major religion in Philippines, unlike in many part of Asia. Also, I think this page intended to discuss about development of Buddhism art that take place in certain region on history, while that region have strong Buddhism influence, not only by small evidence of artefact. Some references that I've checked were unreliable or can't reached again, for example [1][2]. I also noticed, some paragraph on this part are just copied from Buddhism in the Philippines. So, I merge this Philippine part into Buddhism in the Philippines article. -114.124.143.186 (talk) 04:01, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion part on Philippines unwarranted

Gunkarta's deletion of the section on the Philippines here seems unwarranted, what do you guys think?--Farang Rak Tham (talk) 15:05, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually it was related to previous edit made by 114.124.143.186. And the section in this talkpage just above this one Talk:Buddhist art#Philippines part. Maybe you should address this issue in the talk section above. I agree that inclusion of Philippines as an example of distinct Buddhist art just based on two artifact finding (that Tara and Kinnara gold artefact) is undue. The elaboration on Buddhism in Philippines is best moved to related article Buddhism in the Philippines. Thank you. — Gunkarta talk 15:30, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't it mainly the same as Buddhism_in_the_Philippines#Archaeological_evidence? If not, more could be added there, or even in a distinct article. WP:UNDUE here. Johnbod (talk) 16:20, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sorry.--Farang Rak Tham (talk) 21:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Where is India, Buddhist art did not originate from afghanistan or china

The main country which gave birth to buddhism and buddhist art is completely missing, why is that? not one statue in the gallery is from india Rameezraja001 (talk) 17:53, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The first 2 sections are entirely about India. But I've added some text about Ajanta, which was missing, and two pictures. Johnbod (talk) 14:15, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

india/ indian sub continent needs to be given due credit for buddhist art

this greco-buddhist BS should stop peddling, indian must be credited for buddhist art. this article shows eurocentric neo nazi views. Sanchi stupa is the beginning of buddhist arts. Greece is not the origin of buddhism nor buddhist arts.

Buddhist arts and buddhism has nothing to do with greek or any neo nazi european arts.Rameezraja001 (talk) 10:56, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

okaaaaaaay, looks like we have a case of WP:NOTHERE here. Khirurg (talk) 10:59, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Art Additions

Is there any way there could be more art pieces added to the lengthy description of the history to show how the art affected the people of the Buddhist religion? Amayamitchell09 (talk) 00:44, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Buddha Images in the Pali Canon

I am going to edit the Buddhist Art page thus:

There is a general belief that the first Buddha images were made in Greek-influenced Gandhara or possibly first in the more Persian-influenced Mathura.

In c. 200 BCE, the Chinese Emperor is recorded as worshipping a small 'Golden Man'. It seems likely that the culture of Lord Buddha's people were either Scythian or their culture was closely related to Scythian culture, which was adept at producing such small golden images.

Furthermore, it is recorded in the Pali Canon that when Lord Buddha was going to go to teach his mother, who had been born in a Heaven, that the Sangha made an image of him so that they would have a reminder of his presence. This making of an image of Lord Buddha appears more than once in the Pali Canon. At that time, in the Indian Subcontinent, there was no stone carving. So it is recorded that these images were made of wood. Wooden images of thus age did not survive, and it is likely that during anti-Buddhist periods, these golden images would have been melted down for their solid gold content. Indigocat (talk) 10:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]