Talk:Buchwald v. Paramount

A fact from Buchwald v. Paramount appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 September 2004. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Buchwald v. Paramount may (or may not) have set a precedent for questioning spurious Hollywood accounting practices?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2004/September.

Wikipedia

California: San Francisco Bay Area

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Similarity

The only thing that was in Buchwald's treatment was the idea of African royalty coming over to America, and also him spending some time in a New York ghetto. That's not a "story". Even the WGA only considers a story to be a detailed series of beats, otherwise so many producers would claim "story" credit for tiny ideas. (Also, the idea of him ending up as the "emperor of the ghetto" is just plain offensive. African royalty deserves to live in the ghetto and is HAPPY about it? No wonder it never went anywhere.) Johnny "ThunderPeel2001" Walker (talk) 10:45, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hollywood Accounting

There's a reference to "watershed" in this section which led me to this link http://ubrc.gabelliconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/2018-Gabelli-UBRC-Presentation-Abstracts.pdf

That documents has a series of abstracts which includes one that uses the term "watershed" and has similar content to this article, under the heading "The Effects of Buchwald v. Paramount on Hollywood Accounting Thirty Years Later" William Cheng. It could be the source, otherwise there's nothing to support it. Can't find the article. Citing an abstract seems improper. Oblivy (talk) 22:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]