Talk:Bucharest Stock Exchange
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External link
[edit]This a copy of the discussion on 195.210.44.116's talk page, following his addition of this link to the external links section and his answer on my talk page:
Cool down and have a look here before you get all jumpy and hackled up: Wikipedia:External links#Links_normally_to_be_avoided: 11. Links to blogs and personal webpages, except those written by a recognized authority.
If you can prove http://bpe3.blogspot.com/ is an official blog site of the BVB, be my guest and re-add the external link to the article. Mentatus 09:18, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Only because the site is using the www.blogger.com platform, you can not categorize it as a blog or personal webpage. It is a general use website with news focus on the companies quoted at BSE.
Furthermore, the Wikipedia policy sustains this kind of pages:
What should be linked: ... Sites with other meaningful, relevant content that is not suitable for inclusion in an article, such as reviews and interviews.
OK, first of all I'm not sure the content of this website is meaningful and relevant to the article - what do the news about the BSE-listed companies add to it? Nothing about the Bucharest Stock Exchange. Lemme cite some titles: "BCR's Net Profit Rises 20.4% in '06", "BRD's turnover from factoring ops rises over 152pc", "Petrom and Rompetrol may sign contract". Beside the fact these companies are listed there, is this information related to the BSE? No. Are they meaningful or relevant to the BSE? No. IMHO, the site is meaningful or relevant to an investor or a shareholder, it is not encyclopaedic and doesn't add any value to the article. And second of all, I'm not sure you're not related in any way to the site (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest). On the site the news sources are not disclosed and there's no info about the owners or who runs it. Regards, Mentatus 13:36, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Bucharest Stock Exchange. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141221094615/http://www.bespokeinvest.com/thinkbig/2013/12/31/final-2013-country-stock-market-performance-numbers.html to http://www.bespokeinvest.com/thinkbig/2013/12/31/final-2013-country-stock-market-performance-numbers.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141021151146/http://bvb.ro/About/Presentation.aspx?t=1 to http://bvb.ro/About/Presentation.aspx?t=1
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141021140948/http://www.bvb.ro/TradingAndStatistics/IndexTransactions.aspx?index=BET to http://bvb.ro/TradingAndStatistics/IndexTransactions.aspx?index=BET
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130120025704/http://www.cnvmr.ro:80/pdf/legi/en/Law-297-2004.pdf to http://www.cnvmr.ro/pdf/legi/en/Law-297-2004.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130918071600/http://www.cnvmr.ro:80/pdf/regulamente/en/Regulation-01-2006.pdf to http://www.cnvmr.ro/pdf/regulamente/en/Regulation-01-2006.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130918071613/http://www.cnvmr.ro:80/pdf/regulamente/en/Regulation-02-2006.pdf to http://www.cnvmr.ro/pdf/regulamente/en/Regulation-02-2006.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:58, 10 November 2016 (UTC)