Jump to content

Talk:Brussels Airlines

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

The picture on the page is from Belga-press agency and could be a copyright issue here on Wikipedia. I would like the pic to stay in the article but then you must give more info or confirm your the author...

Fair use rationale for Image:Brussels Airlines logo.gif

[edit]

Image:Brussels Airlines logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:19, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BrusselsAirLogo.png

[edit]

Image:BrusselsAirLogo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:52, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move Article

[edit]

I'd like to move this article Brussels Airlines to brussels airlines. On its official website, you can clearly see that the official name is spelled in lower case.

Moreover, I'd like to merge Brussels Airlines. I just don't see any reason why for every airline, the destinations that an airline served, have to be mentioned in a completely separated article. Therefore, I suggest to move merge all the articles that only discuss the destinations with the airline itself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Einsteinbud (talk • contribs) 22:50, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree. [1] As you can clearly see they are saying 'Brussels Airlines' therefor showing the company name is Brussels Airlines but styled as 'brussels airlines'. Zaps93 (talk) 23:11, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree with the move as well for the reason given by Zaps93 (talk · contribs) and have reverted the improper move. If you still believe the move is warranted, please list at Wikipedia: Requested moves. KuyaBriBriTalk 17:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you look at Brussels Airlines' official website ([2]), it styles the name as "Brussels Airlines" everywhere except the official logo. I have compromised and made a reference to the all lower-case styling in the lead. KuyaBriBriTalk 19:55, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

frequent flyer Privilege

[edit]

I believe that Brussels Airlines will convert its frequent flyer program Privilege into Lufthansa's Miles and More. On this page, completely at the bottom of that article, Brussels Airlines clearly says that in the next future, they will bundle their frequent flyer with Lufthansa. There is clear evidence for that. See bottom of that press release: Since mid February the frequent flyers of Brussels Airlines and Lufthansa can use both carriers’ airport lounges. Soon the loyalty programmes of Lufthansa, Swiss and Brussels Airlines will be bundled. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Einsteinbud (talk • contribs) 16 March 2009

The article states that the frequent flyer programs will be bundled. The rolling of Brussels Airlines' frequent flyer program into that of Lufthansa is a logical conclusion given Lufthansa's size compared to Swiss and Brussels. However, one of Wikipedia's core content policies is verifiability. Stating that Brussels' program will be merged/bundled with Lufthansa and Swiss as a result of their codeshare agreement is verifiable; stating that it may be rolled into Lufthansa's program is not, at least with the given sources. KuyaBriBriTalk 20:08, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring over the inclusion of wet-leased aircraft

[edit]

Can everybody involved in this war stop doing it and discuss the changes here? Thanks.--Jetstreamer Talk 17:45, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The project guide is unambiguous on this topic. "Please do not include wet-leased aircraft." As these aircraft are operated by other airlines on other AOCs, they are already listed on those airlines wiki pages. Brussels Airlines is not a exception to the project guide. SempreVolando (talk) 17:56, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I know that. I'm also against the inclusion of these wet-leased aircraft. Please do not war over it--Jetstreamer Talk 19:51, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fleet information

[edit]

Several editors have amended the fleet section inappropriately, adding wet-leased aircraft and supporting information for the fleet from unreliable sources. Please note that the preferred reference for this information is the official national aircraft register (where available, as it is in this case), rather than unreliable sources such as airfleets.net / planespotters.net. Also wet-leases, such as ERJ145 aircraft operated by bmi regional and Dash 8 aircraft operated by flybe, are not to be included as they form part of the fleet of the operating airline, not that of the lessor (per WP:AIRLINES). The section has been reverted to the reliable source at 5 February 2016, please raise any issues or concerns you may have here first rather than revert reliably supported information. Thanks SempreVolando (talk) 17:57, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Totally agree.--Jetstreamer Talk 18:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Brussels Airlines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:13, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Brussels Airlines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fleet Update

[edit]

I tried many times to update (edit) the fleet informations, but every time it goes back to the old version.

I included my source, but it's obviously not enough to prove my modifications. Here it is : https://www.planespotters.net/airline/Brussels-Airlines.

Feel free to update the fleet data since I can't do it.

Have a nice day!

2A02:A03F:2AA2:A900:D059:7AC1:28D9:1579 (talk) 09:07, 5 April 2017 (UTC) Belgian Devil - 05/04/2017[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Brussels Airlines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:11, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brussels Airlines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:21, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

I do not understand why we are not allowed to add a small Gallery showing the special liveries of the airline. It says:

DO NOT ADD GALLERIES OF THE SPECIAL LIVERIES AS THIS IS NOT ALLOWED AS PER WP:AIRLINES AND WILL BE REMOVED

The person who added this did not specify which rule of the WP:AIRLINES that states that such galleries were not allowed. The gallery allows people to see the special livery described by the text.

Also, please correct me if I am wrong, but other major airlines/flag carriers such as China Airlines have a small gallery for special liveries. An example would be China Airlines. If it was an issue of notablility, I would still argue that Brussels Airline is a flag carrier which is recognised internationally and therefore is an important article of Belgium (even though the importance scale is yet to be measured). PatrickChiao (talk) 08:44, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Brussels_Airlines&oldid=1217809825"