Talk:Bruno Manser/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk · contribs) 21:50, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

This article needs some reshaping, some issues are listed below:

• Written like an essay. Not done
• Too many cleanup tags. Not done
• Paragraphs are too short. Not done
• Lead is too short. Not done
• Some facts lack citations. Not done
• Numbers less then nine are represented with words. Done
• "Possible explanations" section sounds unusual and is unecessary Done

I'd normally quickfail this, but I'm giving you seven days to fix these issues, as part of "assuming good faith"--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 22:01, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for taking time to review this article. I have done some changes as per the recommendations. However, the article cannot be further expanded because the book "Bruno Manser:The Inside Story" is not available. I would accept a quickfail for this because the paragraphs are too short. However, would you point out the exact sentences that requires further citations? Thanks. I will nominate the article for peer review first before I nominate it again for GA review in the future.Cerevisae (talk) 23:35, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

• • Failed, and noted with "citation needed" tags.--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 23:48, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

• Issues with criteria below:

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 23:21, 8 August 2015 (UTC)