Jump to content

Talk:Bruno Manser/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk · contribs) 21:50, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs some reshaping, some issues are listed below:

  • Written like an essay. Not done
  • Too many cleanup tags. Not done
  • Paragraphs are too short. Not done
  • Lead is too short. Not done
  • Some facts lack citations. Not done
  • Numbers less then nine are represented with words. Done
  • "Possible explanations" section sounds unusual and is unecessary Done

I'd normally quickfail this, but I'm giving you seven days to fix these issues, as part of "assuming good faith"--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 22:01, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking time to review this article. I have done some changes as per the recommendations. However, the article cannot be further expanded because the book "Bruno Manser:The Inside Story" is not available. I would accept a quickfail for this because the paragraphs are too short. However, would you point out the exact sentences that requires further citations? Thanks. I will nominate the article for peer review first before I nominate it again for GA review in the future.Cerevisae (talk) 23:35, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Issues with criteria below:
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

--Tomandjerry211 (alt) (talk) 23:21, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]