Talk:Brummer-class cruiser/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 17:26, 7 October 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Shouldn't Ol-Marine be Öl-Marine? Couple instances of she vs. they in armament section. Brummer class cruiser should have Brummer-class hyphenated.

   Should all be fixed. Novik doesn't use umlauts so I just followed that. Parsecboy (talk) 10:40, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   Link boilers, presumably water tube.

   Don't forget this.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:43, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

   Oops, thanks for catching that. Parsecboy (talk) 13:56, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   No picture or drawing is available?

   File:Brummer class line drawing.jpg should be fine with fair use (and is probably PD anyway - Novik states it's a reproduction of a contemporary illustration. Parsecboy (talk) 10:40, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: