Talk:Browns Wood

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire articles

UK geography

This redirect falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles

England

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles

Inappropriate infobox???

Browns Wood is just another district of MK. It is completely inappropriate to use the standard free-standing settlement info box.

The ONS pop figures for "Browns Wood" are for a census 'urban sub-area' that is far larger than the Browns Wood district. It is completely misleading to use these.

I have deleted the infobox pending further discussion. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 17:44, 28 July 2008 (UTC)--John Maynard Friedman[reply]

Suggest you check your facts before you make unilateral edits like this next time. The info box did not contain any population information and the comment about ons stats is clearly just a copy edit from other edits you have made. The info box has been on this site for over 12 months. Tmol42 (talk) 19:46, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose that Browns Wood be merged into Walton, Milton Keynes. Browns Wood is not sufficiently significant so as to warrant a separate Wikipedia entry and therefore should be treated like other MK grid squares and merged into the civil parish article. 30gl (talk) 17:23, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I support this proposal. [You read my mind!] --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 12:30, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]