Talk:Brownism

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brownism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Politics of the United Kingdom

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Scottish Labour#Leader of the Scottish Labour Party|Leader of the Scottish Labour Party]] The anchor (#Leader of the Scottish Labour Party) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Contested speedy

Why is that then? Off2riorob (talk) 00:22, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We really should not be using the Daily mirror to link to our articles, it is a very low grade citation to support anything. Off2riorob (talk) 00:28, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The person placing this notice intends to dispute the speedy deletion of this article on this page's talk page, and requests that this page not be deleted in the meantime. Note that this request is not binding, and the page may still be deleted if the page unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria, or if the promised explanation is not provided very soon. Hello? Off2riorob (talk) 00:30, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will prove my rationale for contesting this speedy deletion as soon as I have expanded the article a little. The deletionists will attack the fact it is a little substub ish if I do not expand it Francium12 00:41, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Given the numerous sources now present in the article it should not be speedily deleted :-) Francium12 01:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Its absolute fluffed up rubbish, there is no such thing as Brownism and I can't believe its been created again. Brownites tend to be less enthusiastic about market driven reforms such as tuition fees and foundational hospitals and more keener on the role of the state rubbish, absolute rubbish. To attempt to assert that Brown had an individual set of ideologies that can be clearly defined and expressed is nonsense. Brownite is a not notable idiom or whatever it is called, Blaiite brownite, simple press commentry. http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Brownism . Off2riorob (talk) 11:48, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have you familiarized yourself with Wikipedia's policies on civility :-). If you feel that way feel free to take to AfD (again!) in a few days Francium12 12:13, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

Note that this subject has been through a couple AfDs in the past, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brownism (2nd nomination), however that was for a different version of the article that was unreferenced. -- œ ^™ 14:05, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alistair Darling’s memoirs

Please see Talk:Alistair Darling#Alistair Darling’s memoirs --Mais oui! (talk) 04:40, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]