Jump to content

Talk:Brothers of Destruction

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

We need a picture

[edit]

AD Double J 19:41, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can i update the picture for this year 

Josephizking (talk) 17:53, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 23:05, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Brothers of Destruction → Undertaker and Kane Proposed by: ArtistScientist (talk · contribs)

"Brothers of Destruction" was a nickname. The team was never billed by this name. It was not the team's ring name, it was a nickname used by the commentators. They were never announced as the Brothers of Destruction. They were announced and billed as the Undertaker and Kane. ArtistScientist (talk) 06:11, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 20:31, 13 December 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

The Undertaker and Kane → Brothers of Destruction – Srsrox (talk) 18:10, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The last mover stated that they were never billed the "Brothers of Destruction". I challenge him to verify that. There are countless articles/page titles in which they were billed as such on wwe.com alone:

Although I hate to use YouTube, even YouTube shows a match in which they're called that:

So I have no idea what this argument is about. It needs to be moved back. Srsrox (talk) 18:10, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support I support the move back.--Dcheagle • talk • contribs 20:11, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Of course they have been referred to as The Brothers of Destruction, it's their nickname, just like "The Phenom" or "The Big Red Machine". You have to understand the difference between ring name and nickname, and what it means for a team to be "billed" by a name. You'll find that all of those sources also call Kane and the Undertaker names like "The Big Red Machine" and "The Phenom". That does not make it their ring names, they're simply nicknames. The announcer never announces the team as The Brothers of Destruction, which they would if it was the team's actual ring name. You can point to sources all over the place where wrestlers and teams are called by alternate names, but that doesn't mean they replace their primary name. ArtistScientist (talk) 00:37, 22 November 2012 (UTC) See below[reply]

"The announcer never announces the team as The Brothers of Destruction, which they would if it was the team's actual ring name." Did you ever WATCH the YouTube video? They're CLEARLY announced as that. I suppose then we need to change all tag teams now to the member's names based on your argument? You could use that argument on ALL tag team names. And in any case, WP:COMMONNAME COMPLETELY is involved in this case because it is very clear it is the common name of this tag team. If you want me to, I can point to countless outside-of-WWE sources where they are commonly named "Brothers of Destruction", not the name "The Undertaker and Kane". And by the way, where is it wrong in Wikipedia to name an article based on nickname, ESPECIALLY if it's the most common name? Srsrox (talk) 03:06, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I started to watch that video but had assumed that you were pointing to the commentator's use of the name. Having now watched it to the point that he announcer uses the name, I will concede to your argument that this is how the team is billed. For the first several years BoD was only treated as a nickname, but I stopped watching regularly years ago. ArtistScientist (talk) 05:20, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. Then can you cross out your oppose vote please? Srsrox (talk) 01:14, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Brothers of Destruction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:08, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Brothers_of_Destruction&oldid=1210448100"