Talk:British Columbia Youth Parliament

Loss of info?

I did a quick read through the edits done by User:Agent 86 (a renamed vDF?) and was wondering if anything got left on the "cutting room floor" so to speak. For example, the Skena park construction seems to have been completely excised. Is that a good thing? In general, it does seem to read a bit better as edited. j-beda 17:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

• Yes, you've correctly identified the username change. As for Skeena Terrace, the info is still there (under "“Legislated” projects and programs - General" (FYI, that's the housing development in which an arsonist killed five people this past May). I'm glad it's more "readable", some of the sections were getting pretty long. I also hope the point-of-view is a bit more neutral. Agent 86 18:10, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BCYP Mace.jpg

Image:BCYP Mace.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:54, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BCYP Arms.jpg

Image:BCYP Arms.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:55, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

"House Leaders and Awards" Section.

In order to prevent WP:3RR, I have decided to bring forward the issue regarding if this section should be kept or not.

I think that this section be deleted whole, because it is WP:PLOT. Most readers don't really needs to know award leaders and leaders when they don't necessarily contribute to the encyclopedic content or it's significance. Takipoint123 (talk) 05:10, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

@Canooks: pinging user who has reinstated said section. Takipoint123 (talk) 05:13, 30 October 2024 (UTC)