Talk:British Asian Cup/GA2
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: The C of E (talk · contribs) 17:36, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
I'll review this and I think there are a few issues that needs addressing.
- The lead pic needs a caption Done
- Should at least say that Lord's is in England (I know it's obvious but you have to consider the reader who knows little) Done
- It was only one match so it shouldn't be described as a series Done
- Players when they are first mentioned should have their Christian names and their surnames before using only their surnames afterwards (example: Tanvir in the Build up section) Done
- Who decided to move the 2009 CL to South Africa? Done
- "and was a day/night one." sound better to say it was a day/night match in my opinion
- Done Used event instead of match as match has been already used in the sentence.
- "Fazal and Asnodkar reached to a 50 run partnership", shouldn't have that to in there Done
- Why were the Royals awarded penalty runs?
- Because the ball was deflected by the wicket-keeper's helmet (I have written this)
- The pic of Warne seems a bit oversized to me Done
- Ref 1: What makes burrp.com a reliable source (I'm just asking as I've never come across it before)
- Done Removed
- Ref 3: IANS or Cricinfo? Done
- It should also have an explanation as to why this wasn't made into an annual event
- None of the sources say anything about that.
- Check against the previous GA review too Done
Once these have been sorted, I'll take another look at it. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 17:36, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- I do think that if you want improve the article, it would be helpful to find out why this wasn't made into a regular event. Nevertheless, I am happy that this fulfills the GA criteria. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 07:10, 30 March 2013 (UTC)