Talk:British Alpine

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Livestock task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Aspromonte (goat) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:59, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Aspromonte goat which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:29, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Layout and class

I changed the layout to conform to Wikipedia standards and noted the class is still stub. A review shows the article is at least start class now. If an editor makes improvements leaning towards a class change I would suggest (unless there is contrary reasons) to either ask for a review or at least remove the class rating for future review. There may be a standard way of doing this but having a start class article shown as stub class and awaiting a possible long to arrive review (without a request) does not seem to be a better option. Otr500 (talk) 17:27, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reclassified as stub

The WikiProject classification for British Alpine goat was Start-class. It has been reclassified as Stub-class per request. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 16:10, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

I might try to do some work on this page – improve the sourcing, expand and so on. Were I to do so, I'd change the remaining reference format to the list-defined system – references defined in the reference section, not in the text – and to plain text rather than templated format, both changes for the sake of clarity and simplicity. I might do that in a day or two if no-one minds, but will of course leave well alone if there's any objection. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:03, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]