Talk:Britannica Party
Appearance
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Britannica Party. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Britannica Party at the Reference desk. |
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Britannica Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131113035745/http://www.searchlightmagazine.com/blogs/searchlight-blog/britannica-party-fields-four-candidates to http://www.searchlightmagazine.com/blogs/searchlight-blog/britannica-party-fields-four-candidates
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Stub-Class politics articles
- Low-importance politics articles
- Stub-Class political party articles
- Low-importance political party articles
- Political parties task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles