Jump to content

Talk:Bristol Omnibus Company

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Reference #38

[edit]

I am puzzled by reference #38 to the statement that the company "remains the same legal entity incorporated on 1 October 1887". The Companies House website says that BRISTOL OMNIBUS COMPANY LIMITED was incorporated on 08/12/2003. [1] Jezhotwells (talk) 20:16, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looking into this further I see that in fact the reference is to FIRST SOMERSET & AVON LIMITED being incorporated 1/10/1887. I guess they must have had a time machine. Still puzzled. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:23, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the sequence of events:

  • Company number 25088
    • incorporated 1 Oct 1887 as Bristol Tramways and Carriage Co. Ltd
    • Change of name 1 May 1957 to Bristol Omnibus Company Ltd (this change is too old to be on the CH webscheck service, but it is referenced in Curtis & Walker at p.57)
    • Change of name 26 Feb 1999 to First Bristol Buses Ltd
    • Change of name 30 May 2003 to First Somerset & Avon Ltd
  • Company number 4987248
    • Incorporated 8 Dec 2003 as Bristol Omnibus Company Ltd
    • This is an inactive company - it seems that it was set up by the authors Curtis & Walker to preserve the company name (ref p.224 of their book)

A company can change its name, while remaining the same company, as long as the new name is not the same as the current name of an existing company. But is is quite rare for a company to have survived since the 19th century (I do not know of another existing bus company that old) Mhockey (talk) 22:10, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:35, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that Mhockey has amended the reference #38 so that it now points at [2], which is merely the entrance to the Companies House database. I amended it yesterday to point directly at the page within the database for First Somerset and Avon Limited as [3], which I think is much better. Could you explain? Jezhotwells (talk) 18:30, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think either your link or my link will take you directly to the company page on the Companies House website (at least, they didn't when I tried it just now). You have to input either the company number, the current name or a previous name. (If you enter a name, you then get an extract from the index, from which you pick the company; if you enter the number, you go straight to the right page.) I thought the company number would be least confusing. Mhockey (talk) 21:53, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Bristol Omnibus Company/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Article is well referenced, contains a photo and infobox, merits at least start, maybe higher. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:29, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 22:29, 11 April 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 10:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bristol Omnibus Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:28, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]