Jump to content

Talk:Brisbane Forest Park

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge suggestion

[edit]

As Brisbane Forest Park is now known as the southern part of D'Aguilar National Park, under its new ownership, should this article be merged with the existing D'Aguilar National Park article? Thanks. Figaro (talk) 16:30, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend merging, though in this case the merged article has most of the information (D'Aguilar National Park being barely a stub at this time). I see no reason for there to be two separate articles. Donlammers (talk) 22:08, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brisbane Forest Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:12, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]