Talk:Brihajjabala Upanishad

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brihajjabala Upanishad article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from Brihajjabala Upanishad appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 April 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Akshamalika Upanishad, the Bhasmajabala Upanishad, the Brihajjabala Upanishad, the Kalagni Rudra Upanishad, and the Rudrakshajabala Upanishad glorify Shaiva sectarian practices, such as smearing ash on the body (pictured)?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shaiva Upanishads.

Wikipedia

India: Literature Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian literature workgroup.
	This article was last assessed in February 2015s.

Hinduism: Philosophy Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Philosophy task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Religious texts (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles

Philosophy: Literature / Religion / Eastern / Medieval Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Philosophy of religion
	Eastern philosophy
	Medieval philosophy

Congratulations

Congratulations on making it to today's listing on the "Did You Know..." section of Wikipedia Main Page. The process of making it the listing takes a bit of effort and involves the quick cooperation of many editors. All involved deserve recognition, appreciation, thanks and applause.

Best Regards,

Bfpage |leave a message 16:14, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox image

@Redtigerxyz: Please reconsider the image, as the one you added back illustrates ash smearing but not with Tripundra (it is a different forehead mark). It does not represent what is described in the Brihajjabala Upanishad manuscript, per MOS:IMAGES guidelines. The smoking is misleading too, and nothing to do with the Upanishad. We don't have to go back to what I replaced it with, and I am fine with any other image that is representative and illustrative. How about this or this or something else? I like your idea of one image with ash smearing, but the image should not have an incorrect forehead mark, which Brihajjabala states to be fundamental (see Chatterjee's book page 60). Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 15:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]