Talk:Brightwood (Washington, D.C.)

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia.

Untitled

The information about the boundaries is incorrect, if you search the DC Atlas [1] for Real Property and Assessment Neighborhoods you will find the correct boundaries as defined by the city. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.108.255.234 (talk) 12:56, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's true that, for real estate assessment purposes, Brightwood extends significantly further than the definition currently used by the Brightwood Community Association. A house in the 900 block of Hemlock Street is considered part of Brightwood for real estate assessment purposes, for example, when that area is considered Takoma by many (most?) other agencies and people. It all comes down to who is making the distinction. Quacks Like a Duck (talk) 17:13, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In response to the unsigned comment from 2007...I'd agree with Quacks Like a Duck, that with neighborhood boundaries "it all come down to who is making the distinction." In some cases, more specific neighborhood identities develop that aren't always clearly identified by the broader Brightwood neighborhood definition the city uses for real estate assessments. However, given Quacks Like a Duck's point that "for real estate assessment purposes, Brightwood extends significantly further than the definition currently used by the Brightwood Community Association," it's important to also acknowledge that along some borders the opposite holds true; in some places the Brightwood Community Association's definition (which is used as the source to portray the most likely boundaries on this Brightwood page) actually extends out further than the city's Brightwood boundaries.

For instance, if you look at a house south of Missouri Avenue and east of Georgia Avenue, other sources will tell you that that house is in Brightwood Park--a similarly named but different neighborhood. And if you look at a location south of Missouri Avenue, west of Georgia Avenue, north of Kennedy Street, the DC city atlas will tell you that it's located in the 16th Street Heights neighborhood, not Brightwood. http://citizenatlas.dc.gov/atlasapps/reports.aspx?showreport=239791&QString=

Etopdc (talk) 20:19, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments, Etopdc. After further research about Brightwood, I have learned that the original boundaries of Brightwood were just as vague as they are today. Brightwood was considered far larger than we considered it today. Over 150 years ago, Brightwood included land that is now considered to be Shepherd Park, Takoma Park, Brightwood Park, and Petworth. ~ Quacks Like a Duck (talk) 23:32, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Georgetown (Washington, D.C.) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:34, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.examiner.com/a-659666~District_moving_to_fill_retail_void.html
Triggered by (?<=[/@.])examiner\.com(?:[:/?\x{23}]|$) on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 17:45, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 03:30, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Brightwood (Washington, D.C.). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:55, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Brightwood (Washington, D.C.). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:06, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]