Talk:Brig-Glis

Switzerland High‑importance

	Switzerland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities C‑class

	Cities portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Requested move

Brig, Switzerland → Brig-Glis –

Why it this Municipal not unter the official Name Brig-Glis? Show also the Interwiki-links. Brig ist also a Town/City, and bevor 1973 there are a Municipal Brig! Relisted. BDD (talk) 19:16, 10 December 2012 (UTC) --Bobo11 (talk) 13:06, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment see the merge discussion at Talk:Brig-Glis ; I suppose a split is in order then, since the pre-1973 info on Brig, and the info on the neighboorhood now called Brig should remain at this title, while the merge municipality information would be split back out. -- 65.92.181.190 (talk) 17:22, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment if this is renamed to "Brig-Glis" then that page should be moved to Brig-Glis, Switzerland or Brig-Glis, Valais to preserve its edit history -- 65.92.181.190 (talk) 17:28, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The officiel Name from the political municipality to day is Brig-Glis not Brig. And the Artikel ist writen over the political municipality, not only over the "City" Brig. Earlier hi (bevor 1.1.1973) give a political municipality Brig, Brigerbad and Glis. It wuoud be better, hi give a Artikel over the aktuell municipality Brig-Glis and a other artikel over the old city Brig. Then Brig was on the Middle Ages a marketplace and city.--Bobo11 (talk) 19:56, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support Brig-Glis is the official name of the municipality and Brig, Switzerland should be a redirect to the article about the municipality. How much information is there on the current village of Brig? Is there enough information that is post-1973 and in unique to Brig itself? The pre-1973 history of Brig should remain in the Brig-Glis article because it is a relevant part of how Brig-Glis came to exist. Tobyc75 (talk) 20:52, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment each municipality merged into Brig-Gils can be covered in their own articles, instead of having all of it jumbled together -- 65.92.181.190 (talk) 04:37, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But is there enough unique information for 3 separate articles? In general we've only created articles on individual villages if they are unique or historically important by themselves. Brig might, perhaps barely qualify, but Brigerbad and Glis not so much. Also, right now it's not jumbled, each history section has a sub-header so it's clear which village is covered in each section. Tobyc75 (talk) 16:33, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, hi give a lot of information. Enough for 4 (not 3!), begining with de historiy with 3 seperetat political municipality Brig Gils and Brigerbad. Pls. view on de: but aktuell they woud bee short artikel, he give more to writing. Only Brig is al longer Artikel de:Brig, but this ist a littel bit consequential she is the center of the county. --Bobo11 (talk) 22:33, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The de articles on Glis and Brigerbad are barely longer than stubs. The Brig and Brig-Glis articles are better, but it looks like all 4 articles are just scattering information on the municipality around and all of them put together are about the same size as the one article here. I don't see any advantage to splitting up the article to talk about each village individually.Tobyc75 (talk) 23:43, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The promblem is this. This artikle is writen over the municipal Brig-Glis, but the Lemma is Brig, thats wrong. Hi give also a town with the name Brig. And Brig-Glis are not Brig, it is biger and have more history. Whe dont must-have a artikel Brig, but wie must have a Artikel over the municipal unter the correct Lemma, and this is Brig-Glis.--Bobo11 (talk) 08:26, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support - Since "Brig" is ambiguous and cannot be used, I think it would be something reasonable to use the official form "Brig-Glis" and redirect "Brig, Switzerland" there. mgeo talk 19:18, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Page will be moved once I figure out what to do with the old talk page. Nyttend (talk) 00:17, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Brig-Glis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:59, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Brig-Glis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:41, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]