Talk:Bridget Jones's Diary

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Comedy Mid‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 7 June 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Bridget Jones's Diary (film) to Bridget Jones's Diary. The result of the discussion was moved.

References to use

Please add to the list references that can be used for the film article.

Weaver, John; Kreitzer, Larry (2005). "Bridget Jones' Diary: Self-Image and Self-Worth". In Fiddes, Paul; Clarke, Anthony (eds.). Flickering Images: Theology and Film in Dialogue. Regent's Study Guides. Smyth & Helwys Publishing. ISBN 1573124583.

This Article on the Film does not say one word about what it was ABOUT

DAW 68.159.130.153 20:08, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I included a plot section. Took most of it from the German version, due to laziness.--Gavin1234 11:53, 22 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lame entry

The plot section of this is incredibly lame and should be removed until someone can write a better overview/synopsis.

Fair use rationale for Image:BridgetJonesDiaryMoviePoster.jpg

Image:BridgetJonesDiaryMoviePoster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:16, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:BridgetJonesDiaryMoviePoster.jpg

Image:BridgetJonesDiaryMoviePoster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:06, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Without you by Renee Zellweger

the wiki link to the song Without you by Renee Zellweger directs you to the song by Badfinger, therefore is invalid (even in the cover versions). I am just reading this page after seeing the movie and do not intend to do any edits on this page, can somebody please fix. If nobody fixes within 24 hours I will fix by removing wiki link all together.--Theoneintraining (talk) 00:13, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Headlines

to use with this article--J.D. (talk) 20:52, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Bridget Jones's Diary (film)

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Bridget Jones's Diary (film)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "twice_shy":

From Colin Firth: Steiner, Susie (31 March 2001). "Twice Shy". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 20 May 2008.
From Pride and Prejudice (1995 TV series): Steiner, Susie (31 March 2001). "Twice Shy". The Guardian. Retrieved 2008-05-20. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
From Bridget Jones: Steiner, Susie (31 March 2001). "Twice Shy". The Guardian. Retrieved 2008-05-20. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:24, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moving trivia about birthdays of Hugh Grant and Colin Firth to Talk

Moving this (self-labelled) trivia here. We try to avoid having this sort of thing in articles, and it seemed out of place where it was.

Trivia: Hugh Grant, who portrays Daniel Cleaver, is only one day older than Colin Firth, who portrays Mark Darcy. Grant was born on September 9, 1960, and Firth on September 10, 1960.

If anybody can re-add it to the article in graceful way, I have no objection.

-- 186.221.135.185 (talk) 15:06, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Bridget Jones's Diary which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 23:30, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The record of that discussion is now at Talk:Bridget Jones's Diary (novel). —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 18:54, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge soundtrack article?

CLOSED

no discussion, hence, no consensus as per WP:Consensus. The revert by Aspects is the appropriate action. --Whiteguru (talk) 06:56, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Non-Administrative closure

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The article "Bridget Jones's Diary: Music from the Motion Picture", while successful in charts, contains content that most likely matches the content seen in the film article's "Soundtrack" section. Most of the soundtrack album contains old and new recordings of existing (i.e. previously released) songs. Furthermore, I think the film article can tolerate the soundtrack article's content, like charts and certifications. I doubt the soundtrack article can develop more and more, and the soundtrack album is split into two volumes. --George Ho (talk) 08:38, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I'll take this as either no objections or lack of discussion. I have merged the soundtrack article. Please feel free to revert if you object. --George Ho (talk) 03:13, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted this merge per WP:BRD since no one added their opinion to this notable album having its own article per WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. Aspects (talk) 00:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.