Talk:Brenton See
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Brenton See article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Australia may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Notability and conflict of interest
[edit]This article comes across as just a CV. Currently half the references are from the subject of the article, and notability is questionable. Is there a conflict of interest? Betterkeks (talk) 20:11, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
- With the absence of any awards or any important pieces of art, I don't think this page is notable and I would support deletion. Steelkamp (talk) 06:04, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs of artists and entertainers
- Wikipedia requested photographs of people
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class visual arts articles
- Wikipedia requested images of arts
- WikiProject Visual arts articles
- Stub-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Stub-Class Australian biota articles
- Low-importance Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Stub-Class bird articles
- Low-importance bird articles
- Wikipedia requested images of birds
- WikiProject Birds articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in Australia